Demetri, A;
Davies, A;
Bakhbakhi, D;
Hunt, A;
Ijaz, S;
McGuinness, S;
Beasor, G;
Clayton, G;
Bradley, V;
Bunni, E;
et al.
Demetri, A; Davies, A; Bakhbakhi, D; Hunt, A; Ijaz, S; McGuinness, S; Beasor, G; Clayton, G; Bradley, V; Bunni, E; Kingdon, C; Sharp, A; Burden, C; Khalil, A; Kenny, L; Merriel, A
(2025)
What Should Be Discussed When Considering a Vaginal Birth? A Delphi Consensus Study.
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.
ISSN 1470-0328
https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.70071
SGUL Authors: Khalil, Asma
|
PDF
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (595kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.doc) (Appendix S1)
Supporting information
Download (61kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.doc) (Appendix S2)
Supporting information
Download (53kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Appendix S3)
Supporting information
Download (42kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Appendix S4)
Supporting information
Download (19kB) |
|
|
PDF (Appendix S5)
Supporting information
Download (8MB) |
|
|
PDF (Appendix S6)
Supporting information
Download (9MB) |
|
|
PDF (Table S1)
Supporting information
Download (182kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Table S2)
Supporting information
Download (34kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Table S3)
Supporting information
Download (17kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Table S4)
Supporting information
Download (28kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Table S5)
Supporting information
Download (33kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Table S6)
Supporting information
Download (15kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Table S7)
Supporting information
Download (22kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Table S8)
Supporting information
Download (36kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Table S9)
Supporting information
Download (25kB) |
|
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Table S10)
Supporting information
Download (18kB) |
Abstract
Objective Spontaneous vaginal births are often the presumed choice, representing 45% of UK births. However, information about benefits and risks is inconsistently given, impacting decision‐making and experience. A Core Information Set (CIS) is an agreed set of information points discussed prior to a decision. We aimed to develop a CIS for vaginal birth. Design A Delphi study was used to create the CIS. Information points were identified from a literature search, patient leaflets, interviews, and a survey. These informed a two‐round Delphi survey, where stakeholders rated item importance. Items rated critically important by ≥ 80% of parents or professionals, and of limited importance by < 15%, progressed to consensus meetings, where 20 parents and professionals discussed retained items. The final CIS was populated with an engagement group ensuring accessibility. Setting The study took place in the UK, with participants recruited online. Population Pregnant and postnatal women, birth partners, healthcare professionals, medicolegal professionals, and representatives from relevant organizations. Main Outcome A CIS for vaginal birth. Results 77 information items were identified. In round 1 (631 participants) of the Delphi Survey, 84.5% were from the patient group and 15.5% from the professional group; in round 2 (228 participants), 74.3% were from the patient group and 25.7% from the professional group. 29 items met the criteria for consensus discussion. The final CIS includes 19 information points addressing: labour process, pain relief, labour complications, procedures or interventions during labour, experiences after birth, outcomes for the baby and labour environment. Conclusions This CIS can facilitate discussions and support informed decision‐making about vaginal birth.
| Item Type: | Article | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Additional Information: | © 2025 The Author(s). BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | |||||||||
| Keywords: | Delphi technique, consensus, core information set, informed consent, stakeholders, vaginal birth, women, women's health | |||||||||
| SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: | Academic Structure > Cardiovascular & Genomics Research Institute Academic Structure > Cardiovascular & Genomics Research Institute > Vascular Biology |
|||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology | |||||||||
| ISSN: | 1470-0328 | |||||||||
| Language: | en | |||||||||
| Media of Output: | Print-Electronic | |||||||||
| Related URLs: | ||||||||||
| Publisher License: | Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 | |||||||||
| Projects: |
|
|||||||||
| PubMed ID: | 41255065 | |||||||||
| Dates: |
|
|||||||||
| Go to PubMed abstract | ||||||||||
| URI: | https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118087 | |||||||||
| Publisher's version: | https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.70071 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit Item |

