SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

The maternal postnatal six-week check in women with epilepsy: Does the prevalence or subsequent postpartum health differ from the general postnatal population?

Fitzpatrick, KE; Bowen, L; Li, Y; Kwok, CH; Alderdice, F; Dealmeida, S; Gale, C; Kenyon, S; Quigley, MA; Sanders, J; et al. Fitzpatrick, KE; Bowen, L; Li, Y; Kwok, CH; Alderdice, F; Dealmeida, S; Gale, C; Kenyon, S; Quigley, MA; Sanders, J; Siassakos, D; Carson, C (2025) The maternal postnatal six-week check in women with epilepsy: Does the prevalence or subsequent postpartum health differ from the general postnatal population? PLOS One, 20 (5). e0323135-e0323135. ISSN 1932-6203 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323135
SGUL Authors: Bowen, Liza Jane

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (616kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (S1 Table) Supporting information
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (19kB)
[img] PDF (S1 Fig) Supporting information
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (169kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (S2 Table) Supporting information
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (18kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (S3 Table) Supporting information
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (15kB)

Abstract

Objectives To examine the prevalence of the maternal postnatal six-week check (SWC) in women with epilepsy compared to a sample of the postnatal population without epilepsy, and assess whether the SWC is associated with health outcomes in the first year postpartum. Methods Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum and Hospital Episode Statistics data were used to identify births between January1998-March2020 to women with epilepsy (n = 23,533) and a random sample of births to women without epilepsy (n = 317,369). The adjusted risk ratio (aRR) for not having a SWC in women with compared to without epilepsy was estimated using modified Poisson regression. The association between receiving a SWC and postpartum health outcomes was assessed using Cox regression. Results The likelihood of not having a SWC did not differ between those with and without epilepsy (42.7% vs 43.4%, aRR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.99–1.03). Among all women, not having a SWC was associated with a lower subsequent likelihood of being prescribed prophylactic (aHR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.58–0.60) and emergency (aHR = 0.95, 95%CI = 0.91–0.99) contraception and having urinary and/or faecal incontinence (aHR = 0.67, 95%CI = 0.61–0.73) or dyspareunia, perineal and/or pelvic pain (aHR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.65–0.75) recorded in the year postpartum, with no evidence these associations differed according to whether a woman had epilepsy. Not having a SWC was also associated with a lower likelihood of having depression and/or anxiety recorded in the first year postpartum among those without (aHR = 0.86, 95%CI = 0.84–0.89) but not with epilepsy (aHR = 1.01, 95%CI = 0.93–1.09). The SWC was not associated with epilepsy relevant outcomes (Accident and emergency visits or unplanned hospital admission for epilepsy, mortality). Conclusions Around 2 in every 5 women had no evidence of a maternal SWC, with no evidence epileptic women had a different prevalence to the general postnatal population. The maternal SWC may play a role in increasing the use of contraception and the detection or treatment of adverse health outcomes in the first year postpartum.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2025 Fitzpatrick et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: PLOS One
Editors: Liu, Chun
ISSN: 1932-6203
Language: en
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
PR-PRU-1217-21202National Institute for Health and Care Researchhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
NIHR200165National Institute for Health and Care Researchhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117644
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0323135

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item