Moss, P; Matthews, N; McDonald, R; Jarman, H
(2025)
Diagnosis of carbon monoxide exposure in clinical research and practice: A scoping review.
PLoS One, 20 (2).
e0300989.
ISSN 1932-6203
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300989
SGUL Authors: Jarman, Heather Matthews, Natasha
|
PDF
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
|
![]() |
Microsoft Word (.docx) (S1 Checklist)
Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (86kB) |
|
![]() |
Microsoft Word (.docx) (S1 Table)
Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (21kB) |
|
![]() |
Microsoft Word (.docx) (S2 Table)
Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (23kB) |
|
![]() |
Archive (ZIP) (S3 Table)
Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (80kB) |
|
![]() |
Microsoft Excel (S1 File)
Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (29kB) |
|
![]() |
Microsoft Excel (S2 File)
Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (36kB) |
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To undertake a scoping review to identify methods and diagnostic levels used in determining unintentional, non-fire related carbon monoxide exposure. DESIGN: Online databases and grey literature were searched from 1946 to 2023 identifying 80 papers where carbon monoxide levels were reported. RESULTS: 80 papers were included; 71 research studies and 9 clinical guidelines. Four methods were described: blood carboxyhaemoglobin (arterial or venous blood analysis), carbon monoxide oximetry (SpO2), expired carbon monoxide, and ambient carbon monoxide sampling. Blood analysis methods predominated (60.0% of the papers). Multiple methods of measurement were used in 26 (32.5%) of the papers. Diagnostic levels for carboxyhaemoglobin were described in 54 (67.5%) papers, ranging between 2% and 15%. 26 (32.5%) papers reported diagnostic levels that were adjusted for the smoking status of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Four methods were found for use in different settings. Variability in diagnostic thresholds impairs diagnostic accuracy. Agreement on standardised diagnostic levels is required to enable consistent diagnosis of unintentional, non-fire related carbon monoxide exposure.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2025 Moss et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
Keywords: | Humans, Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, Carboxyhemoglobin, Oximetry, Humans, Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, Carbon Monoxide, Carboxyhemoglobin, Oximetry, General Science & Technology |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: | Academic Structure > Institute of Medical, Biomedical and Allied Health Education (IMBE) Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH) |
Journal or Publication Title: | PLoS One |
ISSN: | 1932-6203 |
Language: | eng |
Publisher License: | Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 |
PubMed ID: | 39908298 |
Go to PubMed abstract | |
URI: | https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117190 |
Publisher's version: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300989 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit Item |