SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Diagnosis of carbon monoxide exposure in clinical research and practice: A scoping review.

Moss, P; Matthews, N; McDonald, R; Jarman, H (2025) Diagnosis of carbon monoxide exposure in clinical research and practice: A scoping review. PLoS One, 20 (2). e0300989. ISSN 1932-6203 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300989
SGUL Authors: Jarman, Heather Matthews, Natasha

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (S1 Checklist) Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (86kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (S1 Table) Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (21kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (S2 Table) Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (23kB)
[img] Archive (ZIP) (S3 Table) Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (80kB)
[img] Microsoft Excel (S1 File) Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (29kB)
[img] Microsoft Excel (S2 File) Supplemental Material
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (36kB)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To undertake a scoping review to identify methods and diagnostic levels used in determining unintentional, non-fire related carbon monoxide exposure. DESIGN: Online databases and grey literature were searched from 1946 to 2023 identifying 80 papers where carbon monoxide levels were reported. RESULTS: 80 papers were included; 71 research studies and 9 clinical guidelines. Four methods were described: blood carboxyhaemoglobin (arterial or venous blood analysis), carbon monoxide oximetry (SpO2), expired carbon monoxide, and ambient carbon monoxide sampling. Blood analysis methods predominated (60.0% of the papers). Multiple methods of measurement were used in 26 (32.5%) of the papers. Diagnostic levels for carboxyhaemoglobin were described in 54 (67.5%) papers, ranging between 2% and 15%. 26 (32.5%) papers reported diagnostic levels that were adjusted for the smoking status of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Four methods were found for use in different settings. Variability in diagnostic thresholds impairs diagnostic accuracy. Agreement on standardised diagnostic levels is required to enable consistent diagnosis of unintentional, non-fire related carbon monoxide exposure.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2025 Moss et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Keywords: Humans, Carbon Monoxide, Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, Carboxyhemoglobin, Oximetry, Humans, Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, Carbon Monoxide, Carboxyhemoglobin, Oximetry, General Science & Technology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical, Biomedical and Allied Health Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS One
ISSN: 1932-6203
Language: eng
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 39908298
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117190
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0300989

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item