SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Why do you think you still have pain? Individuals’ beliefs on the biopsychosocial factors that contribute to their chronic musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative exploration

Dunn, M; Rushton, AB; Heneghan, NR; Soundy, A (2025) Why do you think you still have pain? Individuals’ beliefs on the biopsychosocial factors that contribute to their chronic musculoskeletal pain: a qualitative exploration. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 26 (1). p. 1103. ISSN 1471-2474 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09243-1
SGUL Authors: Dunn, Michael John

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary Material 1) Supporting information
Download (25kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary Material 2) Supporting information
Download (35kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary Material 3) Supporting information
Download (27kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary Material 4) Supporting information
Download (466kB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) is complex with many biopsychosocial factors that contribute to its development. Existing research has established individuals’ beliefs on the biological factors that contribute to CMP, but not psychosocial factors. The aim of this study was to determine individuals’ beliefs on the biopsychosocial factors that contribute to their CMP, with specific focus on beliefs about psychosocial contributors. METHODS: A preliminary exploration using interpretative phenomenological analysis methods is reported according to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research. Adults with CMP were recruited from the general public. Four stages of data analysis were undertaken to identify superordinate and subthemes. RESULTS: In-depth analysis of n = 6 participants’ interviews identified six superordinate themes. Participants with higher disability from their CMP described psychological factors including negative psychological experiences (distress, loss of self-identity, negative thoughts/emotions, and stress), dissatisfaction with healthcare (let down, fobbed off, lack of empathy, lack of trust), and maladaptive coping strategies (catastrophisation, avoidance, external locus of control), and did not believe these contributed to their CMP. Participants with lower disability from their CMP described positive psychological experiences (solution focussed coping, positive attitudes) and believed these contributed to their CMP by reducing its severity. Participants described social factors including historical activities (work, sport, exercise) and believed these contributed to CMP via the perceived impact of activity causing musculoskeletal structural degeneration or injury. Participants believed biological factors such as structural changes (injury, degeneration) were the main cause of the development and persistence of their CMP. CONCLUSION: Individuals with higher disability and negative psychological experiences did not believe these were contributory to their CMP, while those with lower disability and positive psychological experiences believed these do contribute to CMP by reducing its severity. Biological factors such as musculoskeletal structural changes were considered the main cause of CMP. Social factors were believed to contribute to CMP through the perceived impact of physical activity on structural changes. Beliefs are not in keeping with contemporary understandings of CMP which may limit engagement with interventions such as exercise or psychosocial therapies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-025-09243-1.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: Beliefs, Chronic musculoskeletal pain, Interpretative phenomenological analysis, Qualitative
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical, Biomedical and Allied Health Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical, Biomedical and Allied Health Education (IMBE) > Centre for Allied Health
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Language: en
Media of Output: Electronic
Related URLs:
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Dates:
Date Event
2025-12-24 Published
2025-09-25 Accepted
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118164
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-025-09243-1

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item