Swinnen, BEKS;
Buijink, AWG;
Stam, MJ;
Hubers, D;
de Neeling, MGJ;
Keulen, BJ;
Morgante, F;
van Wijk, BCM;
de Bie, RMA;
Ricciardi, L;
et al.
Swinnen, BEKS; Buijink, AWG; Stam, MJ; Hubers, D; de Neeling, MGJ; Keulen, BJ; Morgante, F; van Wijk, BCM; de Bie, RMA; Ricciardi, L; Little, S; Beudel, M
(2025)
Pitfalls and practical suggestions for using local field potential recordings in DBS clinical practice and research.
J Neural Eng, 22 (1).
014001.
ISSN 1741-2552
https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/adaeee
SGUL Authors: Morgante, Francesca
|
PDF
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview |
|
|
PDF
Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
|
![]() |
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary table 1)
Supplemental Material
Download (25kB) |
|
![]() |
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary table 2)
Supplemental Material
Download (25kB) |
Abstract

Local field potential (LFP) recordings using chronically implanted sensing-enabled stimulators are a powerful tool for indexing symptom presence and severity in neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders, and for enhancing our neurophysiological understanding of brain processes. LFPs have gained interest as input signals for closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) and can be used to inform DBS parameter selection. LFP recordings using chronically implanted sensing-enabled stimulators have various implementational challenges.
Approach: Here we describe our collective experience using BrainSense (Medtronic®) for clinical and research work. We aim to provide insightful tips and practical advice to empower readers with the knowledge needed to navigate the intricacies of the device and make the most out of its features.
Main results:
The central issues that apply to several BrainSense features encompass restricted compatibility of stimulation configuration with sensing, differences in electrophysiological signal properties between 'stimulation OFF' and 'stimulation ON at 0.0 mA', and challenges associated with the internal clock of the neurostimulator. In addition, since recordings are obtained from bipolar and not monopolar channels, spatial certainty regarding the distribution of LFPs around the DBS electrode is limited. Several options exist to synchronize LFP time series with external data streams, but standardization and generalization are lacking. The use of at-home chronic LFP recording is limited by a low temporal and spectral resolution. Regarding at-home LFP snapshots, LFP time series are not stored, parts of the power spectrum are censored when stimulating at high or low frequencies, and the stimulation amplitude is not readily available.
Significance: We discussed practical applications, implementation, system limitations, and pitfalls with the aim that sensing can be better applied for clinical practice and research.
.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2025 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. |
Keywords: | Local field potential, deep brain stimulation, recordings, research, sensing, stimulation, 0903 Biomedical Engineering, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1109 Neurosciences, Biomedical Engineering |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: | Academic Structure > Neuroscience & Cell Biology Research Institute Academic Structure > Neuroscience & Cell Biology Research Institute > Neuromodulation & Motor Control |
Journal or Publication Title: | J Neural Eng |
ISSN: | 1741-2552 |
Language: | eng |
Publisher License: | Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 |
PubMed ID: | 39870045 |
Go to PubMed abstract | |
URI: | https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117131 |
Publisher's version: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/adaeee |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit Item |