Kapłon-Cieślicka, A;
Benson, L;
Chioncel, O;
Crespo-Leiro, MG;
Coats, AJS;
Anker, SD;
Filippatos, G;
Ruschitzka, F;
Hage, C;
Drożdż, J;
et al.
Kapłon-Cieślicka, A; Benson, L; Chioncel, O; Crespo-Leiro, MG; Coats, AJS; Anker, SD; Filippatos, G; Ruschitzka, F; Hage, C; Drożdż, J; Seferovic, P; Rosano, GMC; Piepoli, M; Mebazaa, A; McDonagh, T; Lainscak, M; Savarese, G; Ferrari, R; Maggioni, AP; Lund, LH; on behalf of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European
(2002)
A comprehensive characterization of acute heart failure with preserved versus mildly reduced versus reduced ejection fraction - insights from the ESC-HFA EORP Heart Failure Long-Term Registry.
Eur J Heart Fail, 24 (2).
pp. 335-350.
ISSN 1879-0844
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2408
SGUL Authors: Rosano, Giuseppe Massimo Claudio
Abstract
AIMS: To perform a comprehensive characterization of acute heart failure (AHF) with preserved (HFpEF), versus mildly reduced (HFmrEF) versus reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Of 5951 participants in the ESC HF Long-Term Registry hospitalized for AHF (acute coronary syndromes excluded), 29% had HFpEF, 18% HFmrEF, and 53% HFrEF. Hospitalization reasons were most commonly atrial fibrillation (more in HFmrEF and HFpEF), followed by ischaemia (HFmrEF), infection (HFmrEF and HFpEF), worsening renal function (HFrEF), and uncontrolled hypertension (HFmrEF and HFpEF). Hospitalization characteristics included lower blood pressure, more oedema and higher natriuretic peptides with lower ejection fraction, similar pulmonary congestion, more mitral regurgitation in HFrEF and HFmrEF and more tricuspid regurgitation in HFrEF. In-hospital mortality was 3.4% in HFrEF, 2.1% in HFmrEF and 2.2% in HFpEF. Intravenous diuretic (∼80%) and nitrate (∼15%) use was similar but inotrope use greater in HFrEF (16%, vs. HFmrEF 7.4% vs. HFpEF 5.3%). Weight loss and estimated glomerular filtration rate improvement were greater in HFrEF, whereas reduction in natriuretic peptides was similar. Over 1 year post-discharge, events per 100 patient-years (95% confidence interval) in HFrEF versus HFmrEF versus HFpEF were: all-cause death 22 (20-24) versus 17 (14-20) versus 17 (15-20); cardiovascular (CV) death 12 (10-13) versus 8.6 (6.6-11) versus 8.4 (6.9-10); non-CV death 2.4 (1.8-3.1) versus 3.3 (2.1-4.8) versus 4.5 (3.5-5.9); all-cause hospitalization 48 (45-51) versus 35 (31-40) versus 42 (39-46); HF hospitalization 29 (27-32) versus 19 (16-22) versus 17 (15-20); and non-CV hospitalization 7.7 (6.6-8.9) versus 9.6 (7.5-12) versus 15 (13-17). CONCLUSION: In AHF, HFrEF is more severe and has greater in-hospital mortality. Post-discharge, HFrEF has greater CV risk, HFpEF greater non-CV risk, and HFmrEF lower overall risk.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
© 2021 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
Keywords: |
Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction, Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, Hospitalization, Prognosis, Treatment, on behalf of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the ESC Heart Failure Long-Term Registry Investigators, 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, Cardiovascular System & Hematology |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: |
Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS) |
Journal or Publication Title: |
Eur J Heart Fail |
ISSN: |
1879-0844 |
Language: |
eng |
Dates: |
Date | Event |
---|
23 February 2002 | Published | 10 January 2022 | Published Online | 22 December 2021 | Accepted |
|
Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 |
Projects: |
Project ID | Funder | Funder ID |
---|
UNSPECIFIED | Abbott Vascular | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | Amgen Cardiovascular | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | AstraZeneca | http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004325 | UNSPECIFIED | Bayer | http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004326 | UNSPECIFIED | Boehringer Ingelheim | http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001003 | UNSPECIFIED | Boston Scientific | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | Edwards | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | Gedeon Richter Plc | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | Menarini Int. Op. | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | MSD-Merck & Co. | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | Novartis Pharma AG | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | ResMed | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | Sanofi | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | Servier | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | The Alliance Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH and Eli Lilly and Company | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | The Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer Alliance | UNSPECIFIED | UNSPECIFIED | Vifor | UNSPECIFIED |
|
PubMed ID: |
34962044 |
|
Go to PubMed abstract |
URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/114066 |
Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2408 |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 27 Jan 2022.
Actions (login required)
|
Edit Item |