SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Vaccination uptake amongst older adults from minority ethnic backgrounds: A systematic review.

Bhanu, C; Gopal, DP; Walters, K; Chaudhry, UAR (2021) Vaccination uptake amongst older adults from minority ethnic backgrounds: A systematic review. PLoS Med, 18 (11). e1003826. ISSN 1549-1676 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003826
SGUL Authors: Chaudhry, Umar Ahmed Riaz

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (S1 Fig) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (23kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (S1 Table) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (18kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (S2 Table) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (29kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (S1 Text) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (20kB)
[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older adults from minority ethnic backgrounds are at increased risk of contracting COVID-19 and developing severe infection and have increased risk of mortality. Whilst an age-based vaccination approach prioritising older groups is being implemented worldwide, vaccine hesitancy is high amongst minority ethnic groups. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We conducted a systematic review and convergent synthesis to systematically examine perceptions of vaccinations amongst older adults from minority ethnic backgrounds. We included studies that reported on perceptions, beliefs, and attitudes towards vaccinations in older adults aged ≥65 years from a minority ethnic background. We excluded studies of vaccinations in investigation or development, studies focused on specific medical conditions, studies where ethnic background or age group was unidentifiable, systematic reviews, editorials, and conference abstracts. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Virtual Health Library, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, and PROSPERO databases from inception to 15 July 2021. Risk of bias for studies was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. The quality of evidence of collective outcomes was estimated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual) framework. A total of 28 eligible studies conducted between 1997 and 2020 were included in the final analysis (17 quantitative surveys, 8 focus group or interview studies, 2 mixed methods studies, and 1 case-control study). The majority were US studies in English or Spanish, except for 6 studies set in Hong Kong, 2 studies in Japan, 1 study in Brazil, and 1 multi-centre study (including China, Indonesia, Turkey, South Korea, Greece, UK, Brazil, and Nigeria). In total, 28,262 individuals with an estimated mean age of 69.8 years were included, 63.2% of whom were female. We summarised the common concepts and themes across studies and populations using a convergent synthesis analysis. Thirteen themes categorised as barriers or facilitators were identified and grouped into structural factors-healthcare provider and system related, patient related, and policy and operational-and were analysed by minority ethnic group. The main limitation of the study was the predominance of studies from the US and East Asia. CONCLUSIONS: In this systematic review, we found that factors influencing vaccination uptake involve healthcare provider and system, patient-related, and governance-level factors that are specific to the older ethnic minority community being served. The evidence included in this review is supported by high or moderate certainty and can be translated to practice and policy. A tailored, multi-level approach combining increased education, access, and culturally competent discussions with trusted healthcare professionals to address health beliefs can maximise the potential impact of widespread vaccination policies.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2021 Bhanu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Keywords: General & Internal Medicine, 11 Medical and Health Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: PLoS Med
ISSN: 1549-1676
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
4 November 2021Published
28 September 2021Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
RTF1906\131Dunhill Medical Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000377
NIHR301018National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
PubMed ID: 34735440
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/113851
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003826

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item