SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

From consumption to context: assessing poverty and inequality across diverse socio-ecological systems in Ghana

Cavanaugh, AC; Bixby, HR; Mangwani, S; Agyei-Mensah, S; Awuni, CA; Baumgartner, JC; Owusu, G; Robinson, BE (2024) From consumption to context: assessing poverty and inequality across diverse socio-ecological systems in Ghana. Environmental Research Communications, 6 (9). 091009-091009. ISSN 2515-7620 https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad76ff
SGUL Authors: Bixby, Honor Ruth Heathcote

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary data) Supporting information
Download (3MB)

Abstract

Local social and ecological contexts influence the experience of poverty and inequality in a number of ways that include shaping livelihood opportunities and determining the available infrastructure, services and environmental resources, as well as people’s capacity to use them. The metrics used to define poverty and inequality function to guide local and international development policy but how these interact with the local ecological contexts is not well explored. We use a social-ecological systems (SES) lens to empirically examine how context relates to various measures of human well-being at a national scale in Ghana. Using a novel dataset constructed from the 100% Ghanian Census, we examine poverty and inequality at a fine population level across and within multiple dimensions of well-being. First, we describe how well-being varies within different Ghanian SES contexts. Second, we ask whether monetary consumption acts a good indicator for well-being across these contexts. Third, we examine measures of inequality in various metrics across SES types. We find consumption distributions differ across SES types and are markedly distinct from regional distributions based on political boundaries. Rates of improved well-being are positively correlated with consumption levels in all SES types, but correlations are weaker in less-developed contexts like, rangelands and wildlands. Finally, while consumption inequality is quite consistent across SES types, inequality in other measures of living standards (housing, water, sanitation, etc) increases dramatically in SES types as population density and infrastructural development decreases. We advocate that SES types should be recognized as distinct contexts in which actions to mitigate poverty and inequality should better incorporate the challenges unique to each.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Original content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0). Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Keywords: multiple dimensions of inequality, multiple dimensions of poverty, social-ecological systems, sub-Saharan Africa
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Environmental Research Communications
ISSN: 2515-7620
Language: eng
Media of Output: Print-Electronic
Related URLs:
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
209376/Z/17/ZWellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440
Dates:
Date Event
2024-09-17 Published
2024-09-03 Accepted
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117989
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ad76ff

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item