Abstract

BACKGROUND: Splenic artery aneurysms (SAAs) are the third most common abdominal arterial aneurysm. Several radiological features have been associated with their growth rate and rupture risk. We aim to evaluate the accuracy and reliability in assessing these features on computed tomography scans. METHODS: Radiological reports were searched for scans positive for SAA between 2012 and 2021 inclusive. These scans were assessed with our novel radiological proforma by 2 radiologists to determine those criteria which were reliably reported. A nonexpert was then compared against this baseline to assess the reliability of SAA assessment by nonradiologists. Pearson and Spearman rank correlation coefficients and Cohen Kappa statistics was used to assess agreement. RESULTS: A cohort of 170 scans was assessed. A high degree of agreement (correlation coefficient r = 0.89-0.91) was achieved by radiologists for SAA diameter measurement. A high level of agreement was also achieved for calcification (Kappa = 0.827) and previous intervention (1.0), moderate agreement for presence of SAA (0.563), calcification percentage (0.563), morphology (0.446), and presence of thrombus (0.516). Rupture and pseudoaneurysm morphology demonstrated poor agreement (Kappa <0.01) but were rare events limiting interpretation. A nonexpert could achieve comparable diameter measurements (P < 0.05) but had consistently lower kappa agreements for all aneurysm characteristics compared to radiologists. CONCLUSION: Aneurysm diameter, calcification, and previous intervention were the only features reported with high agreement between radiologists. Other SAA characteristics only achieved moderate or poor agreement and so should be used with caution in research and clinical settings.