Abstract

BACKGROUND: Guidance and outcomes of coronary ischemia assessment (IA) in those with structural heart disease (SHD), presenting with monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (MMVT) is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of IA on arrhythmic and non-arrhythmic outcomes in those with SHD. METHODS: Patients presenting with MMVT over a 6-year period to a tertiary center were retrospectively analyzed. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed comparing those undergoing IA to those who did not. The primary endpoint was a composite of VT recurrence, appropriate ICD therapy, heart failure hospitalization, and death. Secondary analysis of the individual components of the composite was performed. Kaplan-Meier, univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to compare the two groups and derive predictors of poor outcomes. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen patients (57.6% ICM) were analyzed. 55.8% underwent IA. Following propensity score-matching, 120 patients remained. At 12 months, freedom from the primary endpoint was 68.3% of those undergoing IA versus 43.3% who did not, p < 0.001, multivariate HR 0.56 (0.34-0.92). This was driven by a reduction in all-cause mortality, with a 12-month survival of 98.3% in those undergoing IA versus 86.5% in those not undergoing IA (p < 0.01). Coronary intervention was associated with a significantly higher event-free 12-month survival compared to those who did not undergo intervention (82.4% vs 51.5%, respectively, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SHD presenting MMVT who undergo an IA have significantly improved freedom from VT recurrence, appropriate ICD therapies, HF hospitalization, and death compared to those who do not, driven by a reduction in mortality.