Ho, L;
Lloyd, K;
Taylor-Rowan, M;
Dawson, S;
Logan, M;
Leitch, S;
Quinn, TJ;
Shenkin, SD;
Parry, SW;
Jarman, H;
et al.
Ho, L; Lloyd, K; Taylor-Rowan, M; Dawson, S; Logan, M; Leitch, S; Quinn, TJ; Shenkin, SD; Parry, SW; Jarman, H; Henderson, EJ
(2023)
Comparing Research Priority-Setting Partnerships for Older Adults Across International Health Care Systems: A Systematic Review.
J Am Med Dir Assoc, 24 (11).
pp. 1726-1745.
ISSN 1538-9375
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2023.09.003
SGUL Authors: Jarman, Heather
|
PDF
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (710kB) | Preview |
|
![]() |
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary Tables 1-5)
Supplemental Material
Download (53kB) |
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Priority setting partnerships (PSPs) attempt to shape the research agenda to address the needs of local populations of interest. We reviewed the PSPs for older adults, with a focus on exemplar health care systems: United Kingdom (UK; publicly funded), United States (private health insurance-based), South Korea (national health insurance-based), and Africa (out-of-pocket). DESIGN: Systematic review. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We searched databases and sources (January 2011-October 202l; updated in February 2023) for PSPs of older adults' health care. METHODS: Based on the British geriatric medicine curriculum, we extracted and categorized the PSP topics by areas and the research priorities by themes, and generated evidence maps depicting and comparing the research gaps across the systems. We evaluated PSP quality using the Nine Common Themes of Good Clinical Practice. RESULTS: We included 32 PSPs (United Kingdom: n = 25; United States: n = 7; South Korea and Africa: n = 0) and identified priorities regarding 27 conditions or service arrangements in the United Kingdom and 9 in the United States (predominantly in neurology/psychiatry). The UK priorities focused on treatments and interventions whereas the US on prognostic/predictive factors. There were notable research gaps within the existing PSPs, including common geriatric conditions like continence and frailty. The PSP quality evaluation revealed issues around lacking inclusion of ethnic minorities. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Research priorities for older adult health care vary internationally, but certain health care systems/countries have no available PSPs. Where PSPs are available, fundamental aspects of geriatric medicine have not been included. Future researchers should conduct prioritizations in different countries, focus on core geriatric syndromes, and ensure the inclusion of all relevant stakeholder groups.
Item Type: | Article | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). | ||||||||
Keywords: | Older adults, health care, priority, Humans, Aged, Global Health, Delivery of Health Care, National Health Programs, Research, Africa, Humans, Research, Aged, National Health Programs, Delivery of Health Care, Africa, Global Health, Older adults, priority, health care, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1110 Nursing, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Geriatrics | ||||||||
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: | Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH) | ||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | J Am Med Dir Assoc | ||||||||
ISSN: | 1538-9375 | ||||||||
Language: | eng | ||||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||||
Publisher License: | Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 | ||||||||
PubMed ID: | 37848169 | ||||||||
Web of Science ID: | WOS:001101346100001 | ||||||||
Go to PubMed abstract | |||||||||
URI: | https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/116156 | ||||||||
Publisher's version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2023.09.003 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit Item |