Pesola, F;
Smith, KM;
Phillips-Waller, A;
Przulj, D;
Griffiths, C;
Walton, R;
McRobbie, H;
Coleman, T;
Lewis, S;
Whitemore, R;
et al.
Pesola, F; Smith, KM; Phillips-Waller, A; Przulj, D; Griffiths, C; Walton, R; McRobbie, H; Coleman, T; Lewis, S; Whitemore, R; Clark, M; Ussher, M; Sinclair, L; Seager, E; Cooper, S; Bauld, L; Naughton, F; Sasieni, P; Manyonda, I; Hajek, P
(2024)
Safety of e-cigarettes and nicotine patches as stop-smoking aids in pregnancy: Secondary analysis of the Pregnancy Trial of E-cigarettes and Patches (PREP) randomized controlled trial.
Addiction, 119 (5).
pp. 875-884.
ISSN 1360-0443
https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16422
SGUL Authors: Ussher, Michael Henry
|
PDF
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (884kB) | Preview |
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Tables S1-S6)
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (38kB) |
||
Microsoft Word (.docx)
Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (91kB) |
Abstract
AIMS: The aim of this study was to examine the safety of e-cigarettes (EC) and nicotine patches (NRT) when used to help pregnant smokers quit. DESIGN: A recent trial of EC versus NRT reported safety outcomes in the randomized arms. We conducted a further analysis based on product use. SETTING: Twenty-three hospitals in England and a stop-smoking service in Scotland took part. PARTICIPANTS: The participants comprised 1140 pregnant smokers. INTERVENTIONS: We compared women using and not using EC and NRT regularly during pregnancy. MEASUREMENTS: Measurements included nicotine intake compared with baseline, birth weight, other pregnancy outcomes, adverse events, maternal respiratory symptoms and relapse in early abstainers. FINDINGS: Use of EC was more common than use of NRT (47.3% vs 21.6%, P < 0.001). Women who stopped smoking (abstainers) and used EC at the end-of-pregnancy (EOP) reduced their salivary cotinine by 45% [49.3 ng/ml, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -79.8 to -10]. Only one abstainer used NRT at EOP. In dual users, cotinine increased by 19% (24 ng/ml, 95% CI = 3.5-68). In women reporting a reduction of at least 50% in cigarette consumption, cotinine levels increased by 10% in those using nicotine products and by 9% in those who did not. Birth weights in dual users and exclusive smokers were the same (3.1 kg). Birth weight in abstainers using either nicotine product was higher than in smokers [3.3 kg, standard deviation (SD) = 0.7] versus 3.1 kg, SD = 0.6; difference = 0.15 kg, 95% CI = 0.05-0.25) and not different from abstainers not using nicotine products (3.1 kg, SD = 0.8). Abstainers and smokers using nicotine products had no worse pregnancy outcomes or more adverse events than abstainers and smokers not using them. EC users reported more improvements than non-users in cough [adjusted relative risk (aRR) = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.37-0.93] and phlegm (aRR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.31-0.92), controlling for smoking status. EC or NRT use had no association with relapse. CONCLUSIONS: Regular use of e-cigarettes or nicotine patches by pregnant smokers does not appear to be associated with any adverse outcomes.
Item Type: | Article | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2024 The Authors. Addiction published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Society for the Study of Addiction. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | ||||||||
Keywords: | Birth weight, e-cigarettes, nicotine, pregnancy, safety, smoking, vaping, 11 Medical and Health Sciences, 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Substance Abuse | ||||||||
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: | Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH) | ||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Addiction | ||||||||
ISSN: | 1360-0443 | ||||||||
Language: | eng | ||||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||||
Publisher License: | Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 | ||||||||
Projects: |
|
||||||||
PubMed ID: | 38229538 | ||||||||
Go to PubMed abstract | |||||||||
URI: | https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115987 | ||||||||
Publisher's version: | https://doi.org/10.1111/add.16422 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
Edit Item |