SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Association of red blood cells and plasma transfusion versus red blood cell transfusion only with survival for treatment of major traumatic hemorrhage in prehospital setting in England: a multicenter study

Tucker, H; Brohi, K; Tan, JWL; Aylwin, C; Bloomer, R; Cardigan, R; Davenport, R; Davies, ED; Godfrey, P; Hawes, R; et al. Tucker, H; Brohi, K; Tan, JWL; Aylwin, C; Bloomer, R; Cardigan, R; Davenport, R; Davies, ED; Godfrey, P; Hawes, R; Lyon, R; McCullagh, J; Stanworth, S; Thompson, J; Uprichard, J; Walsh, S; Weaver, A; Green, L (2023) Association of red blood cells and plasma transfusion versus red blood cell transfusion only with survival for treatment of major traumatic hemorrhage in prehospital setting in England: a multicenter study. Critical Care, 27. p. 25. ISSN 1364-8535 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04279-4
SGUL Authors: Tan, Joachim Wei Li

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (993kB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Table A) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (13kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (171kB)

Abstract

Background In-hospital acute resuscitation in trauma has evolved toward early and balanced transfusion resuscitation with red blood cells (RBC) and plasma being transfused in equal ratios. Being able to deliver this ratio in prehospital environments is a challenge. A combined component, like leukocyte-depleted red cell and plasma (RCP), could facilitate early prehospital resuscitation with RBC and plasma, while at the same time improving logistics for the team. However, there is limited evidence on the clinical benefits of RCP. Objective To compare prehospital transfusion of combined RCP versus RBC alone or RBC and plasma separately (RBC + P) on mortality in trauma bleeding patients. Methods Data were collected prospectively on patients who received prehospital transfusion (RBC + thawed plasma/Lyoplas or RCP) for traumatic hemorrhage from six prehospital services in England (2018–2020). Retrospective data on patients who transfused RBC from 2015 to 2018 were included for comparison. The association between transfusion arms and 24-h and 30-day mortality, adjusting for age, injury mechanism, age, prehospital heart rate and blood pressure, was evaluated using generalized estimating equations. Results Out of 970 recruited patients, 909 fulfilled the study criteria (RBC + P = 391, RCP = 295, RBC = 223). RBC + P patients were older (mean age 42 vs 35 years for RCP and RBC), and 80% had a blunt injury (RCP = 52%, RBC = 56%). RCP and RBC + P were associated with lower odds of death at 24-h, compared to RBC alone (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.69 [95%CI: 0.52; 0.92] and 0.60 [95%CI: 0.32; 1.13], respectively). The lower odds of death for RBC + P and RCP vs RBC were driven by penetrating injury (aOR 0.22 [95%CI: 0.10; 0.53] and 0.39 [95%CI: 0.20; 0.76], respectively). There was no association between RCP or RBC + P with 30-day survival vs RBC. Conclusion Prehospital plasma transfusion for penetrating injury was associated with lower odds of death at 24-h compared to RBC alone. Large trials are needed to confirm these findings.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
Keywords: 11 Medical and Health Sciences, Emergency & Critical Care Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Critical Care
ISSN: 1364-8535
Dates:
DateEvent
17 January 2023Published
14 December 2022Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
MGU0431/MGU0432London Air Ambulance & Barts CharityUNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIEDNHS Blood and TransportUNSPECIFIED
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115065
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04279-4

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item