SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Methods women use for induced abortion and sources of services: insights from poor urban settlements of Accra, Ghana

Agula, C; Henry, EG; Asuming, PO; Agyei-Asabere, C; Kushitor, M; Canning, D; Shah, I; Bawah, AA (2021) Methods women use for induced abortion and sources of services: insights from poor urban settlements of Accra, Ghana. BMC Women's Health, 21 (1). p. 300. ISSN 1472-6874 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01444-9
SGUL Authors: Agula, Caesar

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (935kB)
[img] PDF (Additional file 1) Supporting information
Download (572kB)

Abstract

Background Increasing access to safe abortion methods is crucial for improving women’s health. Understanding patterns of service use is important for identifying areas for improvement. Limited evidence is available in Ghana on factors associated with the type of method used to induce abortion. This paper examined the methods and sources of services used for abortion by women living in poor urban settings of Accra. Methods Data are from a survey that was conducted in 2018 among 1233 women aged 16–44 years who reported ever having had an induced abortion. We estimated a multinomial logistic regression model to examine factors associated with the type of abortion methods women used. We further generated descriptive statistics for the source of abortion services. Results About 50% women used surgical procedures for their last abortion, 28% used medication abortion (MA), 12% used other pills, 3% used injection, and 7% used non-medical methods. However, nearly half (46%) of the women who terminated a pregnancy within the year preceding the survey used medication abortion (MA), 32% used surgical procedures, while 5% used non-medical methods. Women who terminated a pregnancy within three years preceding the survey had a 60% lower chance of using surgical procedures if they did not use MA compared to those who terminated a pregnancy more than 3 years before the survey (Relative Risk Ratio [RRR] 0.4; 95% CI 0.3–0.5). The vast majority (74%) of women who used MA obtained services from pharmacies. Conclusions The use of MA pills to terminate pregnancies has increased in recent years in Ghana and these pills are mostly accessed from pharmacies. This suggests a need for a review of the national guidelines to include pharmacists and chemists in the provision of MA services.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2022. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Women's Health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Language: en
Related URLs:
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Dates:
Date Event
2021-08-16 Published
2021-08-03 Accepted
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118481
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01444-9

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item