SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Attitudes Toward Using Single-Pill Combination (Polypill) Therapy in Heart Failure: Patients’ and Physicians’ Perspectives

Biegus, J; Tymków, R; Butler, J; Metra, M; Chioncel, O; Chopra, V; Adamo, M; Nuñez, J; Rosano, G; Saldarriaga, C; et al. Biegus, J; Tymków, R; Butler, J; Metra, M; Chioncel, O; Chopra, V; Adamo, M; Nuñez, J; Rosano, G; Saldarriaga, C; Böhm, M; Zieroth, S; Ponikowski, P (2026) Attitudes Toward Using Single-Pill Combination (Polypill) Therapy in Heart Failure: Patients’ and Physicians’ Perspectives. ESC Heart Failure. xvag044. ISSN 2055-5822 https://doi.org/10.1093/eschf/xvag044
SGUL Authors: Rosano, Giuseppe Massimo Claudio

[img] PDF Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (482kB)

Abstract

Background Single-pill combinations (SPC, polypills) have proven effective in cardiovascular areas, yet no such therapy exists for patients with heart failure (HF) despite substantial polypharmacy and pill burden in this population. Simplifying treatment through an HF-specific SPC containing key guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) components could improve adherence and outcomes. Methods Two prospective, electronic surveys were conducted between June and October 2025 to assess real-world attitudes toward a polypill in HF with ejection fraction ≤50%. The physician-oriented survey (22 questions) was distributed internationally and explored GDMT practices, perceived needs, barriers, and potential preferred composition of an HF dedicated SPC. The patient-oriented survey (11 questions) explored medication burden, adherence, and perceptions of a potential polypill use. Results A total of 250 physicians and 126 patients participated. Among physicians, 77% reported a clear need for strategies to simplify GDMT optimization in HFrEF, with cost (66%) and polypharmacy (54%) being selected as the most frequent barriers. Nearly all physicians (95%) recognized a real clinical need for an HF-specific SPC, and most perceived it as clinically useful (88%), logistically feasible (76%), and acceptable to patients (94%). Approximately 48% of physicians declared that they would use it regularly, and another 49% would use it in selected patients. The preferred composition of HF-specific SPC included a beta-blocker, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), and SGLT2 inhibitor (61.2%). Among patients, polypharmacy was common (70% taking ≥6 drugs daily), and 75% admitted to occasional non-adherence. Most responders (82%) would support a solution that reduces the pill burden, and 83% would take an HF-specific SCP if offered, particularly if there is no extra cost. Conclusions Both physicians and patients showed strong openness and willingness toward an HF-specific SPC, supporting further development and evaluation of HF-specific polypill strategies.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2026. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: GDMT, polypill, single-pill combination
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Cardiovascular & Genomics Research Institute
Academic Structure > Cardiovascular & Genomics Research Institute > Experimental Cardiology
Journal or Publication Title: ESC Heart Failure
ISSN: 2055-5822
Language: en
Media of Output: Print-Electronic
Related URLs:
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
IDUB.A46B.24.002Wroclaw Medical UniversityUNSPECIFIED
PubMed ID: 41711228
Dates:
Date Event
2026-02-11 Published Online
2026-01-29 Accepted
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118412
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1093/eschf/xvag044

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item