SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Variation in post-operative weight-bearing practice following hip fracture surgery: A national hip fracture audit review

Smith, H; Lindh, A; Aquilina, A; Trompeter, A; Johansen, A; Eardley, W (2025) Variation in post-operative weight-bearing practice following hip fracture surgery: A national hip fracture audit review. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma, 70. p. 103200. ISSN 0976-5662 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103200
SGUL Authors: Trompeter, Alex Joel

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Multimedia component 1) Supporting information
Download (126kB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hip fracture care has undergone a significant transformation, with a growing emphasis on patient experience and functional outcomes. Following national guidance that recommends early unrestricted weight-bearing, it is assumed that this is standard practice across all trauma units. METHODS: Using anonymous aggregate data from the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD) for the 2023 calendar year, weight-bearing status for patients who underwent primary hip fracture surgery across 169 hospitals in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland was investigated. The study excluded revision surgeries, periprosthetic fractures, non-operative cases, and patients who died before surgery. RESULTS: Of 74,513 patients studied, 93.2% were fully weight-bearing, 3.1% were non-weight-bearing, and 3.6% had no data recorded. Significant variation existed across hospitals, with nine hospitals reporting 10% or more of their hip fracture cases as non-weight-bearing and one site recording 100% of patients as non-weight-bearing. DISCUSSION: This study challenges the assumption of uniform early weight-bearing practices. With projected increases in hip fracture admissions and associated healthcare costs, optimising patient mobilisation is crucial. The wide variation in weight-bearing instructions suggests inconsistent application of clinical guidance, which will likely impact patient recovery, length of stay, and overall healthcare efficiency. CONCLUSION: Mobilisation after hip fracture surgery needs to be more consistent. Healthcare leaders must remain vigilant in ensuring full weight-bearing becomes the default approach and seek justification where this is not the case.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2025 The Authors. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: Elderly trauma, Hip fracture, Mobilisation, NHFD, Weight bearing
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical, Biomedical and Allied Health Education (IMBE)
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma
ISSN: 0976-5662
Language: en
Media of Output: Electronic-eCollection
Related URLs:
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
UNSPECIFIEDRoyal College of PhysiciansUNSPECIFIED
Dates:
Date Event
2025-09-23 Published
2025-09-05 Published Online
2025-09-04 Accepted
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118313
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2025.103200

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item