SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Understanding knowledge, beliefs, values and barriers towards cervical cancer screening and self-sampling amongst migrant Muslim women in Southwest London: an in-depth qualitative interview study

Webb, S; Mat Ali, N; Augustin, Y; Hayward, SE; Deal, A; Crawshaw, A; Staines, H; Hayes, K; Hargreaves, S; Krishna, S (2026) Understanding knowledge, beliefs, values and barriers towards cervical cancer screening and self-sampling amongst migrant Muslim women in Southwest London: an in-depth qualitative interview study. BMJ Public Health, 4 (1). e003254-e003254. ISSN 2753-4294 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2025-003254
SGUL Authors: Augustin, Yolanda Sydney Hayward, Sally Elizabeth Crawshaw, Alison Fiona Staines, Henry Michael Hayes, Kevin Hargreaves, Sally Krishna, Sanjeev

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (251kB)
[img] PDF (Supplementary PDF 1) Supporting information
Download (316kB)
[img] PDF (Supplementary PDF 2) Supporting information
Download (265kB)

Abstract

Intro Novel screening methods are needed to increase access to cervical screening, and migrant Muslim women in the UK are particularly at risk of screening non-attendance. In anticipation of the introduction of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) self-sampling into the UK programme, this study explored views of migrant Muslim women in southwest London on understanding of cervical screening, barriers and motivators to engagement and acceptability of vaginal self-sampling. Methods Qualitative in-depth semi-structured individual interviews were carried out via MS Teams video call of 18 Muslim migrant women, with purposive and snowball recruitment. Framework analysis was carried out using NVivo 14 and coding matrix developed using MS Excel. Results Migrant Muslim women felt that self-sampling for hrHPV was likely acceptable and beneficial for some women in their community. Only 44% preferred self-sampling over healthcare worker (HCW)–taken samples because of concerns over technique and inadequate results. There was a lack of understanding of the screening programme, role of HPV and cultural taboo of sexual activity outside of marriage. These barriers may be mitigated by evidence-based information in their own language by a trusted HCW or community champion. Taking their own respiratory swabs during the COVID-19 pandemic made participants more open-minded to self-sampling. Conclusions Low vaginal self-sampling is acceptable to migrant Muslim women; however, over half may still prefer HCW-taken samples. Key strategies for overcoming barriers to self-sampling are prioritising linguistically appropriate materials, partnership with community leaders, flexible access points to screening and confidential modes of result delivery.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2026. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ Group.
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical, Biomedical and Allied Health Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical, Biomedical and Allied Health Education (IMBE) > Centre for Clinical Education (INMECE )
Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ Public Health
ISSN: 2753-4294
Language: en
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
MR/N013638/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
204809/Z/16/ZWellcome Trusthttps://doi.org/10.13039/100010269
318501/Z/24/ZWellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440
LCF/PR/SP21/52930003'la Caixa' Foundationhttps://doi.org/10.13039/100010434
NIHR134801National Institute for Health and Care Researchhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
NIHR206676National Institute for Health and Care Researchhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
NIHR300072National Institute for Health and Care Researchhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
RES 19-20 005St George’s Hospital CharityUNSPECIFIED
Dates:
Date Event
2026-01 Published
2026-01-09 Published Online
2025-12-17 Accepted
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118179
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2025-003254

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item