SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

A case study of partnership in practice: challenges and insights in the development of an academic-community coalition “The Migrant Health Community Research Network”

Carter, J; Knights, F; Ciftci, Y; Mackey, K; Hassan, E; Jusic, A; Al-Sharabi, I; Deal, A; Sanchez Clemente, N; Crawshaw, A; et al. Carter, J; Knights, F; Ciftci, Y; Mackey, K; Hassan, E; Jusic, A; Al-Sharabi, I; Deal, A; Sanchez Clemente, N; Crawshaw, A; Hayward, SE; Faijue, D; Aspray, N; Elkhier, N; Harris, P; Lin, RC-Y; Morais, B; Tizzard, S; Bouaddi, O; Seedat, F; Hargreaves, S (2025) A case study of partnership in practice: challenges and insights in the development of an academic-community coalition “The Migrant Health Community Research Network”. Research Involvement and Engagement, 11 (1). p. 151. ISSN 2056-7529 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-025-00828-7
SGUL Authors: Carter, Jessica Alexandra Hargreaves, Sally

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (3MB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Participatory research (PR) approaches are increasingly prioritised globally, particularly in the UK, where many funders have emphasised meaningful collaboration with those with lived experience to improve health research relevance, translation and impact. Despite this, marginalised groups, such as migrants, remain underrepresented in research, perpetuating health inequities. Migrants, who comprise 16% of the UK population, face systemic barriers to engagement, including distrust, hierarchical academic structures, and lack of inclusivity. PR approaches offer a collaborative framework for empowering migrant voices, balancing research and action, and fostering trust to address these disparities. This case study describes the development of the Migrant Health Community Research Network (MHCRN), a collaboration between migrant community groups, individuals, academics and health professionals from the Migrant Health Research Group, City St Georges University of London (MHRG). Aim MHRG sought to develop a sustainable model for engaging migrants in health research through a co-created network addressing power imbalances and ensuring inclusivity. METHODS: MHRG adopted PR principles, reflecting on the groups collective experience of prior engagement practices and systematically reviewing best practices. A five-phase approach was used: (1) defining agenda and aspirations through group reflection; (2) identifying concerns and challenges through internal reflection and community consultation; (3) conducting community exploratory workshops with co-facilitation; (4) establishing initial network structure based on collectively agreed principles; (5) co-developing a lived experience advisory panel. FINDINGS: The process has resulted in the following outputs: the “Migrant Health Community Research Network” (MHCRN) with guiding principles (equity, diversity, respect, decolonisation, empowerment, community), a network steering group (LEAP, Lived Experience Advisory Panel), community-based collaborations embedding migrant voices at all research stages, capacity building through training and peer researcher roles, and award-winning projects. Key challenges identified include structural inequalities, funding limitations, and institutional barriers. Opportunities emerged around trust-building, shared leadership, and sustainable relationship development. CONCLUSIONS: While the MHCRN represents an important step in embedding meaningful collaboration, challenges persist. This initiative highlights the need for systemic change in academia to support equitable partnerships and inform similar innovative initiatives. By prioritizing non-tokenistic engagement and co-production, the MHCRN sets a foundation for sustained, impactful collaboration to address health inequities and inform policy and practice. PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: Many health research projects fail to involve people they aim to help, especially marginalised groups such as migrants. This often results in research that is neither relevant nor useful. We recognised that the way we have worked with people with lived experience of migration could be improved. Our aim was to create a way to work together long-term so that migrant voices are heard and acted on from the development of research ideas all the way to the delivery and sharing of findings. We decided after talking to many researchers, migrants, community organisations and health care professionals that a migrant health research network that brought together all these voices through relationship building and creative ways of working and sharing ideas would be a good way to do this. We established the Migrant Health Community Research Network (MHCRN) which brings together people living in the United Kingdom with lived experience of migration from all over the world, healthcare professionals working in the National Health Service (NHS) and researchers from City St George’s University of London to improve migrant health. Our network was built step-by-step, starting with open conversations with migrants, healthcare professionals and researchers about challenges they had experienced in involving migrant communities in research and how these could be overcome. We then ran a workshop to shape our vision and agreed on shared principles. The network aims to be long-term, inclusive, and led by those with lived migration experience. Although there are ongoing challenges, this process has taught us valuable lessons about working together in a meaningful way.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: Co-production, Health inequities, Migrant health, Participatory research, Patient engagement, Research priorities
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: Research Involvement and Engagement
ISSN: 2056-7529
Language: en
Media of Output: Electronic
Related URLs:
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
NIHR134801National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
318501/Z/24/ZWellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440
335954/Z/25/ZWellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440
NIHR209895National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
NIHR206676National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
NIHR302827National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
SGL030\1093Academy of Medical Scienceshttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000691
NIHR305024National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
NIHR 303525National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
MR/W006677/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
LCF/PR/SP21/52930003'la Caixa' Foundationhttps://doi.org/10.13039/100010434
MR/N013638/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
NIHR304926National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
Dates:
Date Event
2025-12-24 Published
2025-12-20 Published Online
2025-12-03 Accepted
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118149
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-025-00828-7

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item