Fusari, G;
Coleman, S;
Davies, J;
Dearling, J;
Findlay, J;
Goddard, M;
Ivins, N;
Jones, F;
Leggat, F;
Lowe, R;
et al.
Fusari, G; Coleman, S; Davies, J; Dearling, J; Findlay, J; Goddard, M; Ivins, N; Jones, F; Leggat, F; Lowe, R; McCrudden, C; McKinlay, R; Ndachi Effiang, E; Penny, L; Playle, R; Richardson, D; Riaz, M; Shepherd, L; Shi, T; Szymanski, T; Darzi, A
(2025)
UPBEAT Trial: a randomised feasibility evaluation of a digital system for UPper limB rEhabilitation After sTroke.
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 11 (1).
p. 136.
ISSN 2055-5784
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01727-0
SGUL Authors: Jones, Fiona
Abstract
Background
Stroke rehabilitation is essential, yet many stroke survivors receive insufficient therapy, particularly for arm function. The 2023 UK National Stroke Guidelines recommend ongoing rehabilitation, but resource constraints limit therapy intensity. Digital interventions, such as OnTrack—a wearable system co-designed with stroke survivors, carers and therapists—offer a scalable self-management solution for rehabilitation. This study evaluates the feasibility of implementing OnTrack within NHS stroke services and informs a future RCT.
Methods
A two-arm, parallel-group randomised feasibility trial conducted across three NHS sites. Stroke survivors (n = 30) with arm weakness within 12 months post-stroke were randomised 1:1 to receive either OnTrack plus usual care or usual care alone. The primary outcome was the recruitment rate. Secondary feasibility outcomes included retention, adherence, and intervention fidelity. Secondary clinical measures assessed arm function (MAL-14), self-efficacy (SSEQ), quality of life (EQ-5D-5L), and usability (SUS). A process evaluation explored intervention fidelity and implementation experiences. A preliminary economic evaluation examined data collection feasibility using the Client Service Receipt Inventory (CSRI) and a per-patient costing of the OnTrack intervention.
Results
Thirty participants out of a target of 42 (71.4%) were randomised, with 24/30 (80%) retained at 12 weeks. Intervention adherence was high with participants engaging with OnTrack an average of 6.3 days per week (90.7%). Fidelity of intervention delivery was modest (53.9%), highlighting areas for therapist training improvements. Trends suggested improvements in arm function and self-efficacy across groups. The preliminary economic evaluation confirmed the feasibility of data collection using CSRI, though limitations in accuracy and completeness were identified. A per-patient costing of the OnTrack intervention was achieved. Apparent cost differences between groups, identified through a preliminary cost-consequence analysis, were influenced by an unbalanced distribution of reported service use and should be interpreted with caution.
Conclusions
UPBEAT demonstrated the feasibility of delivering OnTrack in NHS stroke services, with strong retention and adherence. Findings support the potential for a future full-scale RCT, with refinements needed in recruitment procedures, therapist training, and economic data collection methods. Digital self-management tools like OnTrack may offer a scalable approach to increasing rehabilitation intensity, addressing gaps in stroke recovery pathways.
Trial registration
UPBEAT Feasibility Trial, IRAS: 323576, CPMS: 59352. Approved by London Surrey REC on 14/12/2023.
| Item Type: |
Article
|
| Additional Information: |
© The Author(s) 2025. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
| Keywords: |
Digital health intervention, Feasibility trial, Health economic assessment, NHS stroke pathway, Process evaluation, Self-directed therapy, Stroke rehabilitation, Wearable technology |
| SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: |
Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH) |
| Journal or Publication Title: |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies |
| ISSN: |
2055-5784 |
| Language: |
en |
| Media of Output: |
Electronic |
| Related URLs: |
|
| Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 |
| Projects: |
| Project ID | Funder | Funder ID |
|---|
| SBRIH18P2002 | NHS England | UNSPECIFIED |
|
| Dates: |
| Date |
Event |
| 2025-11-07 |
Published |
| 2025-10-13 |
Accepted |
|
| URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118073 |
| Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01727-0 |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 25 Nov 2025.
Actions (login required)
 |
Edit Item |