SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Diagnostic Certainty in Characterizing Liver Lesions in Rectal Cancer: Abbreviated Liver MRI versus CT.

Wale, A; Harris, H; Brown, G (2025) Diagnostic Certainty in Characterizing Liver Lesions in Rectal Cancer: Abbreviated Liver MRI versus CT. Ann Surg Oncol, 32 (4). pp. 2435-2445. ISSN 1068-9265 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16468-2
SGUL Authors: Wale, Anita

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of metastases is crucial but routine staging with contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography (ceMDCT) is suboptimal. A total of 20% will have indeterminate or too small to characterize (TSTC) liver lesions on CT, requiring formal characterization by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This UK cross-sectional study reports our experience undertaking routine abbreviated liver MRI (MRI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 99 patients with rectal cancer had ceMDCT, abbreviated liver MRI, and rectal MRI at diagnosis. Liver imaging was scored for liver metastases, benign or indeterminate/TSTC lesions on a per patient basis. Primary rectal cancer was risk scored on MRI. RESULTS: A total of 42/99 (42%) had liver lesion(s) on ceMDCT versus 55/99 (56%) by MRI, and 46/99 (46%) had high-risk rectal cancer. ceMDCT showed 5 patients with liver metastases, 14 with benign lesions, and 23 with indeterminate/TSTC lesions. MRI showed 6 with liver metastases, 45 with benign lesions, and 4 with indeterminate/TSTC lesions. All liver metastases were in high-risk rectal cancer, OR 17.18 (p = 0.06), with 12.5% conversion rate of TSTC lesions to metastases in high-risk rectal cancer and 0% in low-risk rectal cancer. Diagnostic certainty of the liver findings was achieved in 93% of patients by MRI compared with 45% by ceMDCT (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Abbreviated liver MRI diagnosed fewer indeterminate/TSTC lesions and provided greater diagnostic certainty than ceMDCT, p < 0.0001. High-risk rectal cancer is associated with a higher conversation rate of TSTC lesions to metastases than low-risk rectal cancers. Risk stratified; routine abbreviated liver MRI sequences should be investigated as part of the patient pathway for high-risk rectal cancer.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2025 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: Humans, Liver Neoplasms, Rectal Neoplasms, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Female, Cross-Sectional Studies, Middle Aged, Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Multidetector Computed Tomography, Prognosis, Follow-Up Studies, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Contrast Media
Journal or Publication Title: Ann Surg Oncol
ISSN: 1068-9265
Language: eng
Media of Output: Print-Electronic
Related URLs:
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
UNSPECIFIEDBowel Research UKhttps://doi.org/10.13039/100018063
UNSPECIFIEDImperial College Londonhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000761
UNSPECIFIEDNational Institute Health Research, Biomedical Research Centre at Royal Marsden Hospital and Imperial College LondonUNSPECIFIED
UNSPECIFIEDPelican Cancer Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000872
Dates:
Date Event
2025-04 Published
2025-01-21 Published Online
2024-10-23 Accepted
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/118039
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-16468-2

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item