SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for difficult gallbladders: an observational study of tertiary centre cases

Kawka, M; Jawad, ZAR; Hakim, D; Pai, M; Nazarian, S; Gall, TMH; Wadsworth, C; Nicol, D; Jiao, LR (2025) Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy for difficult gallbladders: an observational study of tertiary centre cases. Surgical Endoscopy, 39 (5). pp. 2958-2963. ISSN 0930-2794 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11586-8
SGUL Authors: Kawka, Michal Igor

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (544kB)

Abstract

Background Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is considered a low-risk procedure, intraoperative bleeding, bile duct injury and bile leak occur frequently in the ‘difficult’ gallbladder. Robotic cholecystectomy (RC) can overcome difficulties related to poor vision and instrumentation in difficult cases to avoid intraoperative complications and conversion to open surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic cholecystectomy in patients with difficult gallbladders referred to a tertiary HPB centre. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of all patients referred to a senior hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeon with a ‘difficult’ gallbladder between December 2013 and March 2024. Primary outcomes were conversion to open procedure, and 30-day post-operative complications. Results A total of 88 difficult gallbladder cases (n = 35 laparoscopic, n = 53 robotic) were referred to a tertiary HPB centre during the study period, consisting of 21.7% of cholecystectomies (n = 404). The total complication rate (14.3% vs 3.8%, OR 4.25, 95% CI 0.77–23.28, p = 0.0951) and conversion rate (8.6% vs 0.0%, OR 11.52, 95% CI 0.57–230.32, p = 0.109) were both higher in the laparoscopic group, but these differences were not statistically significant. The median operative time was significantly higher in the laparoscopic group (108.5 min vs 50.0 min, p = 0.001). Conclusions Both robotic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy are viable approaches in difficult gallbladder cases, with robotic cholecystectomy being associated with potentially fewer complications and conversions to open surgery. Pre-operative referral of patients with difficult gallbladders and the intra-operative abandonment of difficult cases can both be considered safe exit strategies for difficult gallbladder cases.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2025 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: Difficult gallbladder, Gallstones, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, Minimally invasive surgery, Robotic cholecystectomy, Humans, Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Retrospective Studies, Female, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Aged, Conversion to Open Surgery, Adult, Tertiary Care Centers, Gallbladder Diseases, Treatment Outcome, Intraoperative Complications, Operative Time
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Cardiovascular & Genomics Research Institute
Journal or Publication Title: Surgical Endoscopy
ISSN: 0930-2794
Language: en
Media of Output: Print-Electronic
Related URLs:
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Dates:
Date Event
2025-05 Published
2025-03-20 Published Online
2025-01-26 Accepted
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117970
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-11586-8

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item