Evans, J; Wu, G; Selden, D; Buczkowski, H; Thorne, L; Fooks, A; Banyard, A
(2018)
Utilisation of Chimeric Lyssaviruses to Assess Vaccine Protection against Highly Divergent Lyssaviruses.
Viruses, 10 (3).
p. 130.
ISSN 1999-4915
https://doi.org/10.3390/v10030130
SGUL Authors: Fooks, Anthony
![]() |
PDF
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) |
![]() |
PDF (Supplementary material)
Supporting information
Download (386kB) |
Abstract
Lyssaviruses constitute a diverse range of viruses with the ability to cause fatal encephalitis known as rabies. Existing human rabies vaccines and post exposure prophylaxes (PEP) are based on inactivated preparations of, and neutralising antibody preparations directed against, classical rabies viruses, respectively. Whilst these prophylaxes are highly efficient at neutralising and preventing a productive infection with rabies virus, their ability to neutralise other lyssaviruses is thought to be limited. The remaining 15 virus species within the lyssavirus genus have been divided into at least three phylogroups that generally predict vaccine protection. Existing rabies vaccines afford protection against phylogroup I viruses but offer little to no protection against phylogroup II and III viruses. As such, work involving sharps with phylogroup II and III must be considered of high risk as no PEP is thought to have any effect on the prevention of a productive infection with these lyssaviruses. Whilst rabies virus itself has been characterised in a number of different animal models, data on the remaining lyssaviruses are scarce. As the lyssavirus glycoprotein is considered to be the sole target of neutralising antibodies we generated a vaccine strain of rabies using reverse genetics expressing highly divergent glycoproteins of West Caucasian Bat lyssavirus and Ikoma lyssavirus. Using these recombinants, we propose that recombinant vaccine strain derived lyssaviruses containing heterologous glycoproteins may be a suitable surrogate for wildtype viruses when assessing vaccine protection for the lyssaviruses.
Item Type: | Article | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | ||||||||||||
Keywords: | Cell Line, Animals, Chiroptera, Mice, Lyssavirus, Rabies virus, Rhabdoviridae Infections, Rabies, Viral Vaccines, Rabies Vaccines, Antibodies, Viral, Antibodies, Neutralizing | ||||||||||||
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: | Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII) | ||||||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Viruses | ||||||||||||
ISSN: | 1999-4915 | ||||||||||||
Language: | en | ||||||||||||
Media of Output: | Electronic | ||||||||||||
Related URLs: | |||||||||||||
Publisher License: | Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 | ||||||||||||
Projects: |
|
||||||||||||
PubMed ID: | 29543715 | ||||||||||||
Go to PubMed abstract | |||||||||||||
URI: | https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117777 | ||||||||||||
Publisher's version: | https://doi.org/10.3390/v10030130 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
![]() |
Edit Item |