SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

General practice chlamydia testing: a qualitative study of staff approaches using behavioural change theory

Asad, A; Sturrock, BRH; Carter, J; Saunders, JM; Cassell, JA; Rait, G; McDonagh, LK (2025) General practice chlamydia testing: a qualitative study of staff approaches using behavioural change theory. British Journal of General Practice. BJGP.2024.0498-BJGP.2024.0498. ISSN 0960-1643 https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2024.0498
SGUL Authors: Carter, Jessica Alexandra

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (590kB)
[img] PDF (Tables S1, boxes S1-S4) Supporting information
Download (550kB)

Abstract

Background Chlamydia is the most diagnosed bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) in England, but opportunistic testing remains low in general practice despite high prevalence among young people. Attempts to increase testing have been met with little success; therefore, there is a need to explore why rates remain low and how this may be improved. Aim To explore general practice staff perceptions of opportunistic chlamydia testing, including barriers, facilitators, interventions, and policies, using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW). Design & setting Qualitative interviews and focus groups were undertaken with general practice staff in England. Method Twenty-three semi-structured individual interviews and seven focus groups with general practice staff were conducted. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis, followed by thematic categorisation onto the BCW. Results Participants identified several barriers to chlamydia testing corresponding with BCW components, including low perceived knowledge (psychological capability), general practice context (physical opportunity), cultural norms (social opportunity), testing not prioritised (reflective motivation), and concerns about patient reactions (automatic motivation). Proposed intervention functions included education, persuasion (for example, posters), incentivisation (for example, financial incentives), and environmental restructuring (for example, computer reminders). Potential policy categories discussed were communication and marketing (for example, campaigns) and service provision (for example, GP drop-in sessions at other venues). Conclusion This study identified barriers to chlamydia testing in English general practice and potential ways to address these issues, contributing new insights to existing literature. This research can be utilised to design multi-component, impactful interventions to increase testing in general practice and ultimately reduce harm posed by chlamydia infections.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: Chlamydia, behaviour change, general practice
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: British Journal of General Practice
ISSN: 0960-1643
Language: en
Media of Output: Print-Electronic
Related URLs:
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
NIHR300290National Institute for Health and Care Researchhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
PubMed ID: 39740926
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117752
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp.2024.0498

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item