SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Quality improvement project to reduce beta-D-glucan turnaround times in an NHS pathology network

Stone, M; Pope, C; Proudlove, N (2025) Quality improvement project to reduce beta-D-glucan turnaround times in an NHS pathology network. BMJ Open Quality, 14 (2). e003210. ISSN 2399-6641 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003210
SGUL Authors: Pope, Cassie Francesca

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (3MB)
[img] PDF (Supplementary PDF) Supporting information
Download (124kB)

Abstract

Beta-D-glucan (BDG) is a cell wall component of many fungi, detecting this in patients’ serum permits early diagnosis of invasive fungal infections, particularly in patients with haematological malignancy. In critically ill patients in an intensive-care unit, where the prevalence of invasive fungal infection is lower, the high negative predictive value of BDG facilitates withholding or discontinuation of empirical antifungal therapy, contributing to antifungal stewardship. However, for the results of BDG testing to impact patient management, they need to be available within a clinically useful timeframe. The South West London Pathology (SWLP) network routinely sent samples for BDG testing from hospital trusts in our area to the UK Health Security Agency Mycology Reference Laboratory (MRL) at Bristol for analysis. In 2021, the mean turnaround time (TAT) was more than two times the 5-working-days standard stated in the SWLP user handbook. In this quality improvement project (QIP), we identified that the greatest delay was the MRL posting hardcopy reports. We investigated electronic reporting, first for all patient samples, and then only for intensive-care patients. However, we found that information technology (IT) and staffing limitations meant this was not viable. We then investigated commercial solutions and identified an innovative assay, which enabled the implementation of in-house BDG testing that was a good fit with our available staffing resource and laboratory environment. Our aim was to achieve at least 90% of BDG results authorised within 5 working days of sample receipt. Our QIP improved performance on this from 0.88% to 92.8% and reduced the mean TAT from 11.6 to 2.5 days and at lower unit cost. The change has been well received by our laboratory staff, and our pathology operational leads have had very positive feedback from our clinical teams and our antifungal steward.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2025. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ Group.
Keywords: Antibiotic management, Laboratory medicine, Healthcare quality improvement, PDSA
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ Open Quality
ISSN: 2399-6641
Language: en
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117672
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003210

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item