SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Co-designing and testing a management programme with peer support for post-stroke fatigue: Nottingham fatigue after stroke study (NotFAST3)

Ablewhite, J; Thomas, S; das Nair, R; Jones, F; Sprigg, N; Wharrad, H; Drummond, A (2025) Co-designing and testing a management programme with peer support for post-stroke fatigue: Nottingham fatigue after stroke study (NotFAST3). Clinical Rehabilitation, 39 (8). pp. 1080-1091. ISSN 0269-2155 https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251350084
SGUL Authors: Jones, Fiona

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (495kB)
[img] PDF (Supplementary Material) Supporting information
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (202kB)

Abstract

Objective To develop and test a novel programme to support post-stroke fatigue management for testing in a future clinical trial. Design Staged approach to development and preliminary testing. Phases 1 and 2: co-design groups held to agree programme content and resources. Phase 3: training for facilitators developed and delivered. Phase 4: feasibility of programme delivery tested with questionnaires completed at beginning and end, and feedback interviews conducted. Setting Community, online. Participants Stroke survivors with post-stroke fatigue, carers and healthcare professionals. Intervention Post-stroke fatigue management programme supported by ‘buddies’ with lived or professional experience of managing fatigue. Main measures In phase 4, we examined feasibility of programme delivery (recruitment, retention, engagement and acceptability) and preliminary signals of efficacy. Results In phases 1 and 2 we recruited 23 participants (16 stroke survivors, 2 carers and 5 healthcare professionals) and designed resources. In phase 3, 10 people supported training development: 7 received training to be buddies. In phase 4 we recruited 15 people with fatigue; 13 completed the programme. Of these, 13 completed baseline and 12 follow-up questionnaires. All buddies (7/7) and 12/13 participants were interviewed. Mean number of sessions delivered was 9 (SD 3.24; range 3–13) and ranged from 10 to 60 minutes (mean 28 minutes; SD 10.04). Overall, mean fatigue severity reduced, activity increased, and mood measures improved. Participants and buddies were positive about the programme and believed it was worthwhile. Conclusions The programme was acceptable and feasible, with preliminary evidence of efficacy, but some issues need to be addressed in future trial design.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © The Author(s) 2025. Creative Commons License (CC BY-NC 4.0) This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: Clinical Rehabilitation
ISSN: 0269-2155
Language: en
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
NIHR204311National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
Dates:
Date Event
2025-08 Published
2025-06-20 Published Online
2025-05-30 Accepted
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117621
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1177/02692155251350084

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item