SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

A survey on Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) testing in microbiology laboratories in Saudi Arabia: Findings and implications

Alnezary, FS; Almutairi, MS; Alsuwaylim, RO; Albolwi, LM; Alrehaili, MH; Alzahrani, F; Mahmoud, M; Kurdi, A; Godman, B; Almohammed, OA; et al. Alnezary, FS; Almutairi, MS; Alsuwaylim, RO; Albolwi, LM; Alrehaili, MH; Alzahrani, F; Mahmoud, M; Kurdi, A; Godman, B; Almohammed, OA; Thabit, AK (2025) A survey on Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) testing in microbiology laboratories in Saudi Arabia: Findings and implications. TROPICAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 24 (5). pp. 731-738. ISSN 1596-5996 https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v24i5.11
SGUL Authors: Godman, Brian Barr

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (262kB)

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate various critical elements of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) testing in laboratories in Saudi Arabia, encompassing diagnostic techniques employed, testing protocols, specimen handling procedures, result reporting practices, and resource availability. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted via an online survey to assess CDI testing protocols and procedures employed by microbiologists in Saudi Arabia. The questionnaire examined various aspects of testing procedures, laboratory protocols, testing schedules, and obstacles to conducting CDI tests. Differences were compared using Chi-square. P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: The survey elicited responses from 68 hospitals across 13 administrative regions of Saudi Arabia. A total of 52.9 % (n = 36) came from small hospitals (≤ 200 beds), distributed across 8 regions. The Western region contained the highest number of responding hospitals overall (44.1 %, n = 30). There was significant difference in positive CDI tests reported between large hospitals (> 200 beds; 59.4 %, n = 19) and small hospitals (13.9 %, n = 5; p < 0.001). Among laboratories that test in-house, 22.7 % (n = 15) reported using nucleic acid amplification tests, 25.8 % (n = 17) reported sending stool specimens to external laboratories, 11.8 % (n = 8) reported using multistep methods, and 25.8 % (n =17) were unsure of the used tests. Limited institutional budget for CDI testing kits was the most commonly reported barrier by laboratory microbiologists. Conclusion: While CDI testing practices in Saudi Arabian microbiology laboratories generally align with international guidelines, this survey identifies opportunities for improvement through enhanced education, implementation of evidence-based testing algorithms, and addressing resource limitations.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2025 The authors. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License This is an Open Access article that uses a funding model which does not charge readers or their institutions for access and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0) and the Budapest Open Access Initiative (http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read), which permit unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: TROPICAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH
ISSN: 1596-5996
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
QU-APC-2024-9/1Qassim Universityhttps://doi.org/10.13039/501100007414
Dates:
Date Event
2025-06-12 Published
2025-05-19 Accepted
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117516
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v24i5.11

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item