SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Clinical and regulatory development strategies for GBS vaccines intended for maternal immunisation in low- and middle-income countries

Le Doare, K; Benassi, V; Cavaleri, M; Enwere, G; Giersing, B; Goldblatt, D; Heath, P; Hombach, J; Isbrucker, R; Karampatsas, K; et al. Le Doare, K; Benassi, V; Cavaleri, M; Enwere, G; Giersing, B; Goldblatt, D; Heath, P; Hombach, J; Isbrucker, R; Karampatsas, K; Madhi, SA; Smith, AW (2025) Clinical and regulatory development strategies for GBS vaccines intended for maternal immunisation in low- and middle-income countries. Vaccine, 58. p. 127131. ISSN 0264-410X https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127131
SGUL Authors: Le Doare, Kirsty

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (535kB)

Abstract

Group B Streptococcus (GBS) is a leading cause of infant mortality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Several maternal GBS vaccine candidates, aimed at protecting infants, are progressing through clinical trials. The World Health Organisation (WHO) aims to ensure equitable access to safe, effective, and affordable vaccines of assured quality in LMICs, by facilitating regulatory pathways. An alternate approval pathway, based on safety and an immunological endpoint thought to predict clinical benefit (commonly referred to as serological threshold of risk reduction [SToRR]), is being considered for GBS maternal vaccines. Since this approach is new to many LMICs regulators and policymakers, WHO organized consultative meetings at national, regional, and global levels to discuss the feasibility and potential challenges of approving a GBS vaccine based on safety and immunogenicity data alone. These consultations focused on evidence supporting SToRR, their use as endpoints to infer protection, and post-licensure requirements. The aim of the consultations was to reduce the delay between vaccine development, licensure, policy recommendations and use in high-burden LMICs.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: Vaccine
ISSN: 0264-410X
Language: en
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
INV 005318Bill and Melinda Gates Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000865
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117510
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2025.127131

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item