SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Patient knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to antimicrobial use in South African primary health care: Development and testing of the CAMUS and the implications

Ramdas, N; Biyela, T; Thema, M; Sibanda, M; Sono, TM; Campbell, S; Schellack, N; Godman, BB; Meyer, JC (2025) Patient knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to antimicrobial use in South African primary health care: Development and testing of the CAMUS and the implications. Frontiers in Tropical Diseases, 6. ISSN 2673-7515 https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2025.1569076 (In Press)
SGUL Authors: Godman, Brian Barr

[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 30 March 2026.

Download (757kB)

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) poses a global health threat, particularly in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) including South Africa where limited resources and knowledge gaps exacerbate inappropriate antimicrobial use. To address this, the community antimicrobial use scale (CAMUS) was developed to assess patients' knowledge, attitudes and behaviors regarding antimicrobial use in South African primary healthcare (PHC) settings, with the aim of informing antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) strategies. Methods: Development of the CAMUS was informed by a scoping review and theoretical constructs from the Health Belief Model, Social Cognitive Theory, and Theory of Planned Behavior. A pilot study was subsequently conducted in two South African districts, Tshwane (an urban ) and Greater Letaba (a rural district), with 30 adult participants to provide insights into patients' understanding of the items. Data collection involved administering CAMUS alongside a health literacy test followed by cognitive interviews to refine clarity and ensure understanding. A feasibility assessment was also conducted to evaluate the practical implementation of CAMUS in PHC settings. Results: Participants demonstrated varied knowledge of antimicrobial use. While 60% correctly identified antibiotics as effective for bacterial infections, 93.33% incorrectly believed antibiotics could treat viral illnesses such as colds. Marginal health literacy was prevalent (86.67%). The CAMUS demonstrated feasibility, with an average completion time of 10 minutes. Questions were iteratively revised to improve future clarity and relevance based on the results of the cognitive interviews. Key findings highlighted misconceptions about antibiotics and the influence of social norms and systemic barriers on antimicrobial use behaviors. Conclusion: The CAMUS effectively captures the knowledge, attitudes and behaviors of antimicrobial use in South African PHC settings. Pilot testing demonstrated its feasibility to use it as a tool to assess patient knowledge, attitudes and behaviors related to antimicrobial use in a larger population, to subsequently guide AMS initiatives by addressing knowledge gaps and related barriers to improve future antimicrobial use. Future research will include development of a shorter version of the CAMUS, followed by validation in larger, more diverse populations and in local languages to enhance its usability in combatingwhen investigating antimicrobial use and AMR across LMICs

Item Type: Article
Keywords: 1699 Other Studies in Human Society, 2002 Cultural Studies, 2103 Historical Studies, Gender Studies
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: Frontiers in Tropical Diseases
ISSN: 2673-7515
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
129365National Research Foundation of South AfricaUNSPECIFIED
138721National Research Foundation of South AfricaUNSPECIFIED
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117325
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.3389/fitd.2025.1569076

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item