SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Cross-Sectional Study of University Students' Attitudes to 'On Campus' Delivery of COVID-19, MenACWY and MMR Vaccines and Future-Proofing Vaccine Roll-Out Strategies.

Webb, A; Gogoi, M; Weidman, S; Woolf, K; Zavala, M; Ladhani, SN; Pareek, M; Gies, L; Bayliss, CD (2022) Cross-Sectional Study of University Students' Attitudes to 'On Campus' Delivery of COVID-19, MenACWY and MMR Vaccines and Future-Proofing Vaccine Roll-Out Strategies. Vaccines (Basel), 10 (8). p. 1287. ISSN 2076-393X https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081287
SGUL Authors: Ladhani, Shamez Nizarali

[img] PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (492kB)
[img] Archive (ZIP) (Supplementary File 1) Supplemental Material
Download (655kB)

Abstract

University students are a critical group for vaccination programmes against COVID-19, meningococcal disease (MenACWY) and measles, mumps and rubella (MMR). We aimed to evaluate risk factors for vaccine hesitancy and views about on-campus vaccine delivery among university students. Data were obtained through a cross-sectional anonymous online questionnaire study of undergraduate students in June 2021 and analysed by univariate and multivariate tests to detect associations. Complete data were obtained from 827 participants (7.6% response-rate). Self-reporting of COVID-19 vaccine status indicated uptake by two-thirds (64%; 527/827), willing for 23% (194/827), refusal by 5% (40/827) and uncertain results for 8% (66/827). Hesitancy for COVID-19 vaccines was 5% (40/761). COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was associated with Black ethnicity (aOR, 7.01, 95% CI, 1.8-27.3) and concerns about vaccine side-effects (aOR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.23-2.39). Uncertainty about vaccine status was frequently observed for MMR (11%) and MenACWY (26%) vaccines. Campus-associated COVID-19 vaccine campaigns were favoured by UK-based students (definitely, 45%; somewhat, 16%) and UK-based international students (definitely, 62%; somewhat, 12%). Limitations of this study were use of use of a cross-sectional approach, self-selection of the response cohort, slight biases in the demographics and a strict definition of vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine hesitancy and uncertainty about vaccine status are concerns for effective vaccine programmes. Extending capabilities of digital platforms for accessing vaccine information and sector-wide implementation of on-campus vaccine delivery are strategies for improving vaccine uptake among students. Future studies of vaccine hesitancy among students should aim to extend our observations to student populations in a wider range of university settings and with broader definitions of vaccine hesitancy.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: COVD-19, MMR, meningitis, university students, vaccine hesitancy, vaccine uptake, COVD-19, meningitis, MMR, vaccine hesitancy, university students, vaccine uptake
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII)
Journal or Publication Title: Vaccines (Basel)
ISSN: 2076-393X
Language: eng
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
ES/W00299X/1Economic and Social Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269
MR/V027549/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
UNSPECIFIEDNational Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
PubMed ID: 36016175
Web of Science ID: WOS:000845111400001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/117302
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines10081287

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item