SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Inappropriate Therapy and Shock Rates Between the Subcutaneous and Transvenous Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator: A Secondary Analysis of the PRAETORIAN Trial.

Olde Nordkamp, LRA; Pepplinkhuizen, S; Ghani, A; Boersma, LVA; Kuschyk, J; El-Chami, MF; Behr, ER; Brouwer, TF; Kääb, S; Mittal, S; et al. Olde Nordkamp, LRA; Pepplinkhuizen, S; Ghani, A; Boersma, LVA; Kuschyk, J; El-Chami, MF; Behr, ER; Brouwer, TF; Kääb, S; Mittal, S; Quast, A-FBE; van der Stuijt, W; Smeding, L; de Veld, JA; Tijssen, JGP; Bijsterveld, NR; Richter, S; Brouwer, MA; de Groot, JR; Kooiman, KM; Lambiase, PD; Neuzil, P; Vernooy, K; Alings, M; Betts, TR; Bracke, FALE; Burke, MC; de Jong, JSSG; Wright, DJ; Jansen, WPJ; Whinnett, ZI; Nordbeck, P; Knaut, M; Philbert, BT; van Opstal, JM; Chicos, AB; Allaart, CP; Borger van der Burg, AE; Dizon, JM; Miller, MA; Nemirovsky, D; Surber, R; Upadhyay, GA; Weiss, R; de Weger, A; Wilde, AAM; Knops, RE; PRAETORIAN Investigators (2024) Inappropriate Therapy and Shock Rates Between the Subcutaneous and Transvenous Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator: A Secondary Analysis of the PRAETORIAN Trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol, 17 (12). e012836. ISSN 1941-3084 https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012836
SGUL Authors: Behr, Elijah Raphael

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (844kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
PDF (Tables S1–S5, Figures S1 and S2) Supplemental Material
Download (367kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inappropriate therapy (IAT) is an undesirable side effect of implantable cardiac defibrillator (ICD) therapy. Early studies with the subcutaneous ICD (S-ICD) showed relatively high inappropriate shock (IAS) rates. The PRAETORIAN (Prospective Randomized Comparison of Subcutaneous and Transvenous Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy) trial demonstrated that the S-ICD is noninferior to the transvenous ICD (TV-ICD) with regard to the combined end point of IAS and complications. This secondary analyses evaluates all IAT in the PRAETORIAN trial. METHODS: This international, multicenter trial randomized 849 patients with an indication for ICD therapy between S-ICD (n=426) and TV-ICD therapy (n=423). ICD programming was mandated by protocol. All analysis were performed in the modified intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: In both groups 42 patients experienced IAT (48-month Kaplan-Meier estimated cumulative incidence, 9.9% and 10.1%, respectively; hazard ratio (HR), 0.99 [95% CI, 0.65-1.52]; P=0.97). There was no significant difference in patients experiencing IAS between both groups (P=0.14). In the S-ICD group, 81 IAT episodes with 124 IAS and 1 inappropriate antitachycardia pacing occurred versus 89 IAT episodes with 130 IAS and 124 inappropriate antitachycardia pacing in the TV-ICD group. IAT episodes were most frequently caused by supraventricular tachycardias in the TV-ICD group (n=83/89) versus cardiac oversensing in the S-ICD group (n=40/81). In the TV-ICD group, a baseline heart rate >80 bpm (HR, 1.99 [95% CI, 1.05-3.76]; P=0.03), a history of atrial fibrillation (HR, 2.66 [95% CI, 1.41-5.02]; P=0.003), and smoking (HR, 2.46 [95% CI, 1.31-4.09]; P=0.005) were independent predictors for IAT. A QRS duration >120 ms was an independent predictor for IAT caused by cardiac oversensing in the S-ICD group (HR, 3.13 [95% CI, 1.34-7.31]; P=0.008). Post-IAS interventions significantly reduced IAS recurrence in both groups (P=0.046). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in IAT and IAS rates between the S-ICD and TV-ICD in a conventional ICD population, but causes and predictors for IAT differed between the devices. After the first IAS, an intervention significantly reduced the recurrence rate of IAS. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01296022.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2024 The Authors. Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology is published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is properly cited, the use is noncommercial, and no modifications or adaptations are made.
Keywords: arrhythmia, ventricular, defibrillators, implantable, electrophysiology, tachycardia, supraventricular, Humans, Defibrillators, Implantable, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Electric Countershock, Treatment Outcome, Risk Factors, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, PRAETORIAN Investigators, Humans, Treatment Outcome, Electric Countershock, Risk Factors, Prospective Studies, Defibrillators, Implantable, Time Factors, Aged, Middle Aged, Female, Male, atrial fibrillation, deibrillators, heart rate, incidence, smoking, 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1116 Medical Physiology, Cardiovascular System & Hematology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Cardiovascular & Genomics Research Institute
Academic Structure > Cardiovascular & Genomics Research Institute > Clinical Cardiology
Journal or Publication Title: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
ISSN: 1941-3084
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
December 2024Published
3 December 2024Published Online
23 October 2024Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
ISROTH20076Boston ScientificUNSPECIFIED
PubMed ID: 39624908
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/116988
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012836

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item