Abstract

BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines recommend Ablation (ABL) in atrial fibrillation (AF) for rhythm control; guidance for antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) post-ablation is limited. OBJECTIVE: To understand AAD and ABL practices in USA and Europe. METHODS: An online survey of experienced cardiologists (CDs, n=360) and interventional electrophysiologists (EPs, n=269) was conducted. AAD and ABL related survey questions and responses were analyzed. RESULTS: ABL was preferred more often as first-line AF therapy (Rx) by US CDs/EPs (p<.001). ABL was selected to avoid AAD Rx by 46% (50% CDs, 40% EPs), prevent AF progression by 41% (36% CDs, 47% EPs) and for superior efficacy by 28% (27% CDs, 30% EPs), ABL was employed by 9% in asymptomatic AF (9% CDs, 10% EPs), by 14% in subclinical AF (13% CDs, 14% EPs), by 17% for first AF event (15% CDs, 18% EPs). Primary ABL was preferred in heart failure by 38%. Co-morbidities, age and left atrial size were limitations for ABL by 48%, 40% and 38%, respectively. AADs were used after ABL for AF/ atrial tachycardia (AT) prophylaxis by 34% for 3-6 months and 29% for 1-2 months. AADs were given for a single AF recurrence by 34%, bridging to re-ablation by 32%, and long-term Rx by 34%. AF/AT post-ABL was most often managed with amiodarone (42-48%). CONCLUSION: ABL was frequently preferred over AADs in symptomatic AF but was notably also used for asymptomatic and subclinical AF. Post-ABL AAD Rx for AF prophylaxis or recurrence was frequent with empiric amiodarone being the most often selected AAD.