SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Post-Pandemic Maternity Care Planning for Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Women, Partners, Health Care Professionals, and Policy Makers in the United Kingdom.

Dasgupta, T; Boulding, H; Easter, A; Sutedja, T; Khalil, A; Mistry, HD; Horgan, G; Van Citters, AD; Nelson, EC; von Dadelszen, P; et al. Dasgupta, T; Boulding, H; Easter, A; Sutedja, T; Khalil, A; Mistry, HD; Horgan, G; Van Citters, AD; Nelson, EC; von Dadelszen, P; Duncan, EL; The Resilient Study Group; Silverio, SA; Magee, LA (2024) Post-Pandemic Maternity Care Planning for Vaccination: A Qualitative Study of the Experiences of Women, Partners, Health Care Professionals, and Policy Makers in the United Kingdom. Vaccines (Basel), 12 (9). p. 1042. ISSN 2076-393X https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12091042
SGUL Authors: Khalil, Asma

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Maternal vaccination during pregnancy, in general and against COVID-19 infection, offers protection to both mother and baby, but uptake remains suboptimal. This study aimed to explore the perceptions regarding COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, particularly for marginalised populations and those living with social or medical complexity. A total of 96 semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 40 women, 15 partners, 21 HCPs, and 20 policy makers, across all four nations of the United Kingdom (UK), discussing their lived experience of utilising, delivering, or developing policy for COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy during the pandemic. Three themes were derived: (1) historical and social context, (2) communication of information and guidance, and (3) appraisal and action. Together these captured the participants' legacy of mistrust in drugs during pregnancy; prior positive experiences; concerns about missing information, conflicting information, or false information about COVID-19 vaccines; and confusing guidance for pregnant women. The final theme describes the participants' behaviour and actions undertaken consequent to their experiences and the available information. The findings suggest efforts to improve COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy may be best focused on personalised communication of information. A trusting relationship and prior positive experiences with other vaccines, both in and outside of pregnancy, positively influenced perceptions of COVID-19 vaccination.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: COVID-19, healthcare professionals, maternity care, partners, policy makers, qualitative research, vaccination, women, women’s health, maternity care, COVID-19, vaccination, qualitative research, women, partners, healthcare professionals, policy makers, women's health
Journal or Publication Title: Vaccines (Basel)
ISSN: 2076-393X
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
11 September 2024Published
4 September 2024Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
NIHR134293National Institute for Health and Care Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
NIHR-INF-2170National Institute for Health and Care Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
ES/P00703/1Economic and Social Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000269
PubMed ID: 39340072
Web of Science ID: WOS:001323196500001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/116873
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines12091042

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item