SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

The value of angiogenetic biomarkers in the detection of early onset fetal growth restriction.

Giorgione, V; Ramnarine, S; Malik, A; Bhide, A (2024) The value of angiogenetic biomarkers in the detection of early onset fetal growth restriction. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 299. pp. 91-95. ISSN 1872-7654 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.05.036
SGUL Authors: Bhide, Amarnath

[img] PDF Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 29 May 2025.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB)

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The identification of fetal growth restriction (FGR) due to uteroplacental insufficiency is important to improve perinatal outcomes. To distinguish FGR from small for gestational age (SGA), FGR consensus definition is currently based on biometry and/or additional biophysical parameters. This study aims to verify if this definition might be modified by including circulating angiogenic factors. STUDY DESIGN: This historical cohort study included singleton pregnancies with SGA fetuses after 20 weeks. All patients underwent detailed ultrasound and measurements of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) and placental growth factor (PlGF) at first assessment. ISUOG criteria for FGR were applied. Total PlGF was calculated using free PlGF, sFlt-1 and a receptor pharmacology model, and multiple of the median (MoM) values for sFlt-1, free PlGF, total PlGF and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio were calculated to adjust for gestational age. RESULTS: 72 pregnancies with SGA were first evaluated at median (IQR) of 28+5 (26+2 -31+3) weeks' gestation, and 51 fetuses (70.8 %) satisfied the FGR consensus definition. Pregnancies with FGR showed significantly lower levels of free and total PlGF MoM (0.12, 95 % IQR: 0.07-0.36 vs 0.32, 95 % IQR: 0.20-0.53, p = 0.008) and 0.26, 95 % CI: 0.16-0.55 vs 0.43, 95 % IQR: 0.23-0.53, p = 0.028) respectively; and higher sFlt-1 MoM (4.62, 95 % IQR: 1.80-7.30 vs 1.74, 95 % IQR:1.11-3.61, p = 0.014) than pregnancies not classified as FGR. Free and total PlGF MoM correlated significantly with gestational age at delivery (r = 0.776, p < 0.001 and r = 0.707, p < 0.001, respectively). sFlt-1 MoM and sFlt-1/PlGF ratio MoM also correlated with gestational age at delivery (r = -0.681, p < 0.001 and r = -0.823, p < 0.001). Six cases identified as FGR at first ultrasound were not confirmed at birth showing significantly higher levels of free PlGF MoM (0.77, 95 % IQR: 0.27-3.07 vs 0.17, 95 % IQR: 0.08-0.43, p = 0.022). CONCLUSION: These findings show that total as well as free PlGF levels are lower in pregnancies affected with placental growth restriction. Angiogenic biomarkers might improve the differentiation between placental growth restriction and constitutional smallness. Further studies are needed to determine how to integrate them into the current definitions of FGR.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2024. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Keywords: Angiogenic markers, Fetal growth restriction, Uteroplacental insufficiency, Humans, Fetal Growth Retardation, Female, Pregnancy, Placenta Growth Factor, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1, Adult, Biomarkers, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Infant, Newborn, Gestational Age, Cohort Studies, Humans, Fetal Growth Retardation, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Cohort Studies, Gestational Age, Pregnancy, Adult, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Female, Biomarkers, Placenta Growth Factor, Fetal growth restriction, Angiogenic markers, Uteroplacental insufficiency, Angiogenic markers, Fetal growth restriction, Uteroplacental insufficiency, 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: TACRI
Journal or Publication Title: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
ISSN: 1872-7654
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
7 June 2024Published
29 May 2024Published Online
28 May 2024Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
PubMed ID: 38850897
Web of Science ID: WOS:001259527700001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/116725
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.05.036

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item