Abstract

AIMS: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used off-label to treat patients with left ventricular thrombus (LVT). We analyzed available meta-data comparing DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for efficacy and safety. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search and meta-analysis of observational and randomized data comparing DOACs versus VKAs in patients with LVT. Endpoints of interest were stroke or systemic embolism, thrombus resolution, all-cause death, and a composite bleeding endpoint. Estimates were pooled using a random-effect model meta-analysis, and their robustness was investigated using sensitivity and influential analyses. RESULTS: We identified 22 articles (18 observational studies, 4 small randomized clinical trials) reporting on a total of 3,587 patients (2,489 VKA vs. 1,098 DOAC therapy). The pooled estimates for stroke or systemic embolism (OR 0.81; 95% CI [0.57, 1.15]) and thrombus resolution (OR 1.12; 95% CI [0.86; 1.46]) were comparable, and there was low heterogeneity overall across the included studies. DOAC use was associated with lower odds of all-cause death (OR 0.65; 95%CI [0.46; 0.92]) and a composite bleeding endpoint (OR 0.67; 95%CI [0.47; 0.97]). A risk of bias was evident particularly for observational reports, with some publication bias suggested in funnel plots. CONCLUSION: In this comprehensive analysis of mainly observational data, the use of DOACs was not associated with a significant difference in stroke or systemic embolism, or thrombus resolution compared to VKA therapy. The use of DOACs was associated with a lower rate of all-cause death and fewer bleeding events. Adequately sized randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings, which could allow a wider adoption of DOACs in patients with LVT.