SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

International Criteria for Reporting Study Quality for Sudden Cardiac Arrest/Death Tool.

Edwards, JJ; Compton, C; Chatrath, N; Petek, BJ; Baggish, A; Börjesson, M; Chung, E; Corrado, D; Drezner, JA; Gati, S; et al. Edwards, JJ; Compton, C; Chatrath, N; Petek, BJ; Baggish, A; Börjesson, M; Chung, E; Corrado, D; Drezner, JA; Gati, S; Gray, B; Kim, J; La Gerche, A; Malhotra, A; Marijon, E; Papadakis, M; Pelliccia, A; Phelan, D; Semsarian, C; Sharma, S; Sharma, R; O'Driscoll, JM; Harmon, KG (2024) International Criteria for Reporting Study Quality for Sudden Cardiac Arrest/Death Tool. J Am Heart Assoc, 13 (11). e033723. ISSN 2047-9980 https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.033723
SGUL Authors: Sharma, Sanjay Malhotra, Aneil

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (596kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies reporting on the incidence of sudden cardiac arrest and/or death (SCA/D) in athletes commonly lack methodological and reporting rigor, which has implications for screening and preventative policy in sport. To date, there are no tools designed for assessing study quality in studies investigating the incidence of SCA/D in athletes. METHODS AND RESULTS: The International Criteria for Reporting Study Quality for Sudden Cardiac Arrest/Death tool (IQ-SCA/D) was developed following a Delphi process. Sixteen international experts in sports cardiology were identified and invited. Experts voted on each domain with subsequent moderated discussion for successive rounds until consensus was reached for a final tool. Interobserver agreement between a novice, intermediate, and expert observer was then assessed from the scoring of 22 relevant studies using weighted and unweighted κ analyses. The final IQ-SCA/D tool comprises 8 domains with a summated score of a possible 22. Studies are categorized as low, intermediate, and high quality with summated IQ-SCA/D scores of ≤11, 12 to 16, and ≥17, respectively. Interrater agreement was "substantial" between all 3 observers for summated IQ-SCA/D scores and study categorization. CONCLUSIONS: The IQ-SCA/D is an expert consensus tool for assessing the study quality of research reporting the incidence of SCA/D in athletes. This tool may be used to assist researchers, reviewers, journal editors, and readers in contextualizing the methodological quality of different studies with varying athlete SCA/D incidence estimates. Importantly, the IQ-SCA/D also provides an expert-informed framework to support and guide appropriate design and reporting practices in future SCA/D incidence trials.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: SCA/D, athletes’ heart, sports cardiology, sudden cardiac death, Humans, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Consensus, Incidence, Delphi Technique, Research Design, Athletes, Sports Medicine, Observer Variation, Humans, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Observer Variation, Incidence, Consensus, Sports Medicine, Research Design, Delphi Technique, Athletes, Athletes, Consensus, Death, Sudden, Cardiac, Delphi Technique, Humans, Incidence, Observer Variation, Research Design, Sports Medicine, athletes’ heart, SCA/D, sports cardiology, sudden cardiac death, 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: ?? 61 ??
Journal or Publication Title: J Am Heart Assoc
ISSN: 2047-9980
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
4 June 2024Published
23 May 2024Published Online
15 April 2024Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 38780180
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/116560
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.123.033723

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item