SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography: Establishing Normal.

Mills, M; Brezgyte, G; Ho, B; Pearce, J; Gordon, K; Mortimer, PS; Ostergaard, P; Howe, FA (2024) Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography: Establishing Normal. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. p. 101870. ISSN 2213-3348 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101870
SGUL Authors: Ostergaard, Pia Howe, Franklyn Arron Mills, Michael James

[img]
Preview
PDF Accepted Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (9MB) | Preview
[img] Video (MP4) (Supplementary Video 1) Supplemental Material
Download (2MB)
[img] Video (MP4) (Supplementary Video 2) Supplemental Material
Download (3MB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite an increased interest in visualising the lymphatic vessels (lymphatics) with Magnetic Resonance Lymphangiography (MRL), there remains little literature describing their appearance in non-lymphoedematous individuals. To determine lymphatic abnormalities, an understanding of how healthy lymphatics appear and behave needs to be established. In this study, MRL of individuals without a history of lymphatic disease was therefore performed. METHODS: A total of 25 individuals (15 female) underwent MRL of their lower limbs using a 3.0T Philips MRI scanner. The first 9 cases were recruited to establish the concentration of Gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) to administer, with the remainder imaged pre- and post-inter-digital forefoot GBCA injections at the optimised dose. Outcomes including lymphatic vessel diameter, tortuosity and the frequency of drainage via particular drainage routes were recorded. RESULTS: Healthy lymphatics following the anteromedial pathway were routinely observed in post-contrast T1 weighted images (average tortuosity = 1.09 ±0.03), with an average of 2.16 ± 0.93 lymphatic vessels, of diameter 2.47 ± 0.50 mm, crossing the anterior ankle. In six limbs, vessels following the anterolateral pathways were observed. No vessels traversing the posterior of the legs were seen. In a subset of ten vessels lymphatic signal, measured at the ankle, peaked 29:50 ± 09:29 mm:ss after GBCA administration. No lymphatic vessels were observed in T2 weighted images. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced MRL reliably depicts the lymphatics in the legs of healthy controls. Following inter-digital contrast injection, anteromedial drainage appears dominant. Quantitative measures related to lymphatic vessel size, tortuosity and drainage rate are readily obtainable, and could be beneficial for detecting even subtle lymphatic impairment.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2024 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Society for Vascular Surgery. Under a Creative Commons license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Keywords: Lower Extremity, Lymphatic Vessels, Lymphography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Journal or Publication Title: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord
ISSN: 2213-3348
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
20 March 2024Published Online
6 March 2024Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
MR/P011543/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
RG/17/7/33217British Heart Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000274
PubMed ID: 38513796
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/116344
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101870

Statistics

Item downloaded times since 25 Mar 2024.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item