SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Magnetic resonance lymphangiography: Establishing normal.

Mills, M; Brezgyte, G; Ho, B; Pearce, J; Gordon, K; Mortimer, PS; Ostergaard, P; Howe, FA (2024) Magnetic resonance lymphangiography: Establishing normal. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord, 12 (4). p. 101870. ISSN 2213-3348 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101870
SGUL Authors: Ostergaard, Pia Howe, Franklyn Arron Mills, Michael James

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Video (MP4) (Supplementary Video 1) Supplemental Material
Download (2MB)
[img] Video (MP4) (Supplementary Video 2) Supplemental Material
Download (3MB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite an increased interest in visualizing the lymphatic vessels with magnetic resonance lymphangiography (MRL), little literature is available describing their appearance in nonlymphedematous individuals. To determine lymphatic abnormalities, an understanding of how healthy lymphatic vessels appear and behave needs to be established. Therefore, in this study, MRL of individuals without a history of lymphatic disease was performed. METHODS: A total of 25 individuals (15 women) underwent MRL of their lower limbs using a 3.0 T Philips magnetic resonance imaging scanner (Philips Medical Systems). The first nine participants were recruited to establish the concentration of gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) to administer, with the remainder imaged before and after interdigital forefoot GBCA injections at the optimized dose. Outcomes, including lymphatic vessel diameter, tortuosity, and frequency of drainage via particular drainage routes, were recorded. RESULTS: Healthy lymphatic vessels following the anteromedial pathway were routinely observed in post-contrast T1-weighted images (average tortuosity, 1.09 ± 0.03), with an average of 2.16 ± 0.93 lymphatic vessels with a diameter of 2.47 ± 0.50 mm crossing the anterior ankle. In six limbs, vessels following the anterolateral pathways were observed. No vessels traversing the posterior of the legs were seen. In a subset of 10 vessels, the lymphatic signal, measured at the ankle, peaked 29 minutes, 50 seconds ± 9 minutes, 29 seconds after GBCA administration. No lymphatic vessels were observed in T2-weighted images. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced MRL reliably depicts the lymphatic vessels in the legs of healthy controls. Following interdigital contrast injection, anteromedial drainage appears dominant. Quantitative measures related to lymphatic vessel size, tortuosity, and drainage rate are readily obtainable and could be beneficial for detecting even subtle lymphatic impairment.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Copyright � 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the So�ciety for Vascular Surgery. This is an open access article under the CC BY li�cense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
Keywords: Lower extremity, Lymphatic vessels, Lymphography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Lower Extremity, Lymphatic Vessels, Lymphography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > REF 2021 user group
Journal or Publication Title: J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord
ISSN: 2213-3348
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
18 June 2024Published
20 March 2024Published Online
6 March 2024Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
MR/P011543/1Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
RG/17/7/33217British Heart Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000274
PubMed ID: 38513796
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/116344
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101870

Statistics

Item downloaded times since 25 Jun 2024.

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item