van der Velden, FJS;
Lim, E;
Gills, L;
Broadey, J;
Hayes, L;
Roberts, E;
Courtney, J;
Ball, J;
Herberg, J;
Galassini, R;
et al.
van der Velden, FJS; Lim, E; Gills, L; Broadey, J; Hayes, L; Roberts, E; Courtney, J; Ball, J; Herberg, J; Galassini, R; Emonts, M; DIAMONDS consortium
(2023)
Biobanking and consenting to research: a qualitative thematic analysis of young people's perspectives in the North East of England.
BMC Med Ethics, 24 (1).
p. 47.
ISSN 1472-6939
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00925-w
SGUL Authors: Drysdale, Simon Bruce
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Biobanking biospecimens and consent are common practice in paediatric research. We need to explore children and young people's (CYP) knowledge and perspectives around the use of and consent to biobanking. This will ensure meaningful informed consent can be obtained and improve current consent procedures. METHODS: We designed a survey, in co-production with CYP, collecting demographic data, views on biobanking, and consent using three scenarios: 1) prospective consent, 2) deferred consent, and 3) reconsent and assent at age of capacity. The survey was disseminated via the Young Person's Advisory Group North England (YPAGne) and participating CYP's secondary schools. Data were analysed using a qualitative thematic approach by three independent reviewers (including CYP) to identify common themes. Data triangulation occurred independently by a fourth reviewer. RESULTS: One hundred two CYP completed the survey. Most were between 16-18 years (63.7%, N = 65) and female (66.7%, N = 68). 72.3% had no prior knowledge of biobanking (N = 73). Acceptability of prospective consent for biobanking was high (91.2%, N = 93) with common themes: 'altruism', 'potential benefits outweigh individual risk', 'frugality', and '(in)convenience'. Deferred consent was also deemed acceptable in the large majority (84.3%, N = 86), with common themes: 'altruism', 'body integrity' and 'sample frugality'. 76.5% preferred to reconsent when cognitively mature enough to give assent (N = 78), even if parental consent was previously in place. 79.2% wanted to be informed if their biobanked biospecimen is reused (N = 80). CONCLUSION: Prospective and deferred consent acceptability for biobanking is high among CYP in the UK. Altruism, frugality, body integrity, and privacy are the most important themes. Clear communication and justification are paramount to obtain consent. Any CYP with capacity should be part of the consenting procedure, if possible.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this
licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
Keywords: |
Assent, Biobank, Children and young people, Consent, Paediatrics, Child, Humans, Female, Adolescent, Biological Specimen Banks, Prospective Studies, Informed Consent, Parental Consent, Qualitative Research, England, DIAMONDS consortium, Humans, Prospective Studies, Qualitative Research, Informed Consent, Parental Consent, Adolescent, Child, Biological Specimen Banks, England, Female, Paediatrics, Biobank, Consent, Assent, Children and young people, 2201 Applied Ethics, Applied Ethics |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: |
Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII) |
Journal or Publication Title: |
BMC Med Ethics |
ISSN: |
1472-6939 |
Language: |
eng |
Dates: |
Date | Event |
---|
5 July 2023 | Published | 21 June 2023 | Accepted |
|
Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 |
Projects: |
|
PubMed ID: |
37407992 |
Web of Science ID: |
WOS:001022890500001 |
|
Go to PubMed abstract |
URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/116135 |
Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00925-w |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 07 Feb 2024.
Actions (login required)
|
Edit Item |