SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Impact of high-risk prenatal screening results for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome on obstetric and neonatal management: Secondary analysis from the SMART study

Martin, K; Norton, ME; MacPherson, C; Demko, Z; Egbert, M; Haeri, S; Malone, F; Wapner, RJ; Roman, AS; Khalil, A; et al. Martin, K; Norton, ME; MacPherson, C; Demko, Z; Egbert, M; Haeri, S; Malone, F; Wapner, RJ; Roman, AS; Khalil, A; Faro, R; Madankumar, R; Strong, N; Silver, R; Vohra, N; Hyett, J; Kao, C; Hakonarson, H; Jacobson, B; Dar, P (2023) Impact of high-risk prenatal screening results for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome on obstetric and neonatal management: Secondary analysis from the SMART study. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 43 (13). pp. 1574-1580. ISSN 0197-3851 https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6483
SGUL Authors: Khalil, Asma

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (342kB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supporting Information S1) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (19kB)
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supporting Information S2) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (298kB)

Abstract

Objective One goal of prenatal genetic screening is to optimize perinatal care and improve infant outcomes. We sought to determine whether high-risk cfDNA screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) affected prenatal or neonatal management. Methods This was a secondary analysis from the SMART study. Patients with high-risk cfDNA results for 22q11.2DS were compared with the low-risk cohort for pregnancy characteristics and obstetrical management. To assess differences in neonatal care, we compared high-risk neonates without prenatal genetic confirmation with a 1:1 matched low-risk cohort. Results Of 18,020 eligible participants enrolled between 2015 and 2019, 38 (0.21%) were high-risk and 17,982 (99.79%) were low-risk for 22q11.2DS by cfDNA screening. High-risk participants had more prenatal diagnostic testing (55.3%; 21/38 vs. 2.0%; 352/17,982, p < 0.001) and fetal echocardiography (76.9%; 10/13 vs. 19.6%; 10/51, p < 0.001). High-risk newborns without prenatal diagnostic testing had higher rates of neonatal genetic testing (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 0%; 0/51, P < 0.001), echocardiography (30.8%; 4/13 vs. 4.0%; 2/50, p = 0.013), evaluation of calcium levels (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 4.1%; 2/49, P < 0.001) and lymphocyte count (53.8%; 7/13 vs. 15.7%; 8/51, p = 0.008). Conclusions High-risk screening results for 22q11.2DS were associated with higher rates of prenatal and neonatal diagnostic genetic testing and other 22q11.2DS-specific evaluations. However, these interventions were not universally performed, and >50% of high-risk infants were discharged without genetic testing, representing possible missed opportunities to improve outcomes for affected individuals.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2023 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Keywords: 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
ISSN: 0197-3851
Dates:
DateEvent
23 December 2023Published
8 December 2023Published Online
21 November 2023Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Web of Science ID: WOS:001117771300001
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115926
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6483

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item