Martin, K;
Norton, ME;
MacPherson, C;
Demko, Z;
Egbert, M;
Haeri, S;
Malone, F;
Wapner, RJ;
Roman, AS;
Khalil, A;
et al.
Martin, K; Norton, ME; MacPherson, C; Demko, Z; Egbert, M; Haeri, S; Malone, F; Wapner, RJ; Roman, AS; Khalil, A; Faro, R; Madankumar, R; Strong, N; Silver, R; Vohra, N; Hyett, J; Kao, C; Hakonarson, H; Jacobson, B; Dar, P
(2023)
Impact of high-risk prenatal screening results for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome on obstetric and neonatal management: Secondary analysis from the SMART study.
PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 43 (13).
pp. 1574-1580.
ISSN 0197-3851
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6483
SGUL Authors: Khalil, Asma
|
PDF
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (342kB) | Preview |
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supporting Information S1)
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (19kB) |
||
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supporting Information S2)
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (298kB) |
Abstract
Objective One goal of prenatal genetic screening is to optimize perinatal care and improve infant outcomes. We sought to determine whether high-risk cfDNA screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) affected prenatal or neonatal management. Methods This was a secondary analysis from the SMART study. Patients with high-risk cfDNA results for 22q11.2DS were compared with the low-risk cohort for pregnancy characteristics and obstetrical management. To assess differences in neonatal care, we compared high-risk neonates without prenatal genetic confirmation with a 1:1 matched low-risk cohort. Results Of 18,020 eligible participants enrolled between 2015 and 2019, 38 (0.21%) were high-risk and 17,982 (99.79%) were low-risk for 22q11.2DS by cfDNA screening. High-risk participants had more prenatal diagnostic testing (55.3%; 21/38 vs. 2.0%; 352/17,982, p < 0.001) and fetal echocardiography (76.9%; 10/13 vs. 19.6%; 10/51, p < 0.001). High-risk newborns without prenatal diagnostic testing had higher rates of neonatal genetic testing (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 0%; 0/51, P < 0.001), echocardiography (30.8%; 4/13 vs. 4.0%; 2/50, p = 0.013), evaluation of calcium levels (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 4.1%; 2/49, P < 0.001) and lymphocyte count (53.8%; 7/13 vs. 15.7%; 8/51, p = 0.008). Conclusions High-risk screening results for 22q11.2DS were associated with higher rates of prenatal and neonatal diagnostic genetic testing and other 22q11.2DS-specific evaluations. However, these interventions were not universally performed, and >50% of high-risk infants were discharged without genetic testing, representing possible missed opportunities to improve outcomes for affected individuals.
Item Type: | Article | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2023 The Authors. Prenatal Diagnosis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | ||||||||
Keywords: | 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1114 Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine | ||||||||
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: | Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS) | ||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS | ||||||||
ISSN: | 0197-3851 | ||||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||||
Publisher License: | Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 | ||||||||
Web of Science ID: | WOS:001117771300001 | ||||||||
URI: | https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115926 | ||||||||
Publisher's version: | https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.6483 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
Edit Item |