Badran, AR;
Youngs, A;
Forman, A;
Elms, M;
Chang, L-L;
Lebbe, F;
Reekie, A;
Short, J;
Hlaing, MT;
Watts, E;
et al.
Badran, AR; Youngs, A; Forman, A; Elms, M; Chang, L-L; Lebbe, F; Reekie, A; Short, J; Hlaing, MT; Watts, E; Hipps, D; Snape, K
(2023)
Proactive familial cancer risk assessment: a service development study in UK primary care.
BJGP Open, 7 (4).
BJGPO.2023.0076.
ISSN 2398-3795
https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0076
SGUL Authors: Snape, Katie Mairwen Greenwood
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Family history assessment can identify individuals above population-risk for cancer to enable targeted Screening, Prevention, and Early Detection (SPED). Family History Questionnaire Service (FHQS) is a resource-efficient patient-facing online tool to facilitate this. In the UK, cancer risk assessment is usually only offered to concerned individuals proactively self-presenting to their GP, leading to inequity in accessing SPED in the community. AIM: To improve access to community cancer genetic risk assessment and explore barriers to uptake. DESIGN & SETTING: Service development project of a digital pathway using the FHQS for cancer risk assessment across four general practices within the clinical remit of the South West Thames Centre for Genomics (SWTCG). METHOD: 3100 individuals aged 38-50 years were invited to complete the FHQS through either text message or email. A random selection of 100 non-responders were contacted to determine barriers to uptake. RESULTS: In total, n = 304/3100 (10%) registered for the FHQS. Responders were more likely to be British (63% vs 47%, P<0.001), speak English as their main language (92% vs 76%, P<0.001), and not require an interpreter (99.6% vs 94.9%, P = 0.001). Of 304 responders, 158 (52%) were automatically identified as at population-risk without full family history review. Of the remaining 146 responders, 52 (36%) required either additional screening referral (n = 23), genetics referral (n = 15), and/or advice to relatives (n = 18). Of 100 non-responders contacted, eight had incorrect contact details and 53 were contactable. Reasons for not responding included not receiving invitation details (n = 26), losing the invitation (n = 5), or forgetting (n = 4). CONCLUSION: The FHQS can be used as part of a low-resource primary care pathway to identify individuals in the community above population-risk for cancer requiring action. This study highlighted barriers to uptake requiring consideration to maximise impact and minimise inequity.
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 05 Jan 2024.
Actions (login required)
|
Edit Item |