Caffry, J;
Selby, M;
Barr, K;
Morgan, G;
McGurk, D;
Scully, P;
Park, C;
Caridis, A-M;
Southworth, E;
Morrison, J;
et al.
Caffry, J; Selby, M; Barr, K; Morgan, G; McGurk, D; Scully, P; Park, C; Caridis, A-M; Southworth, E; Morrison, J; Clark, DJ; Davies, BMO; Eckersley, NM; Groppelli, E; Kirwan, DE; Monahan, I; Augustin, Y; Toombs, C; Planche, T; Staines, HM; Krishna, S
(2023)
The QuantuMDx Q-POC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay for rapid detection of COVID-19 at point-of-care: preliminary evaluation of a novel technology.
Scientific Reports, 13 (1).
ISSN 2045-2322
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35479-9
SGUL Authors: Staines, Henry Michael Krishna, Sanjeev
Abstract
Abstract: Accurate and rapid point-of-care (PoC) diagnostics are critical to the control of the COVID-19 pandemic. The current standard for accurate diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 is laboratory-based reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assays. Here, a preliminary prospective performance evaluation of the QuantuMDx Q-POC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay is reported. Between November 2020 and March 2021, 49 longitudinal combined nose/throat (NT) swabs from 29 individuals hospitalised with RT-PCR confirmed COVID-19 were obtained at St George’s Hospital, London. In addition, 101 mid-nasal (MN) swabs were obtained from healthy volunteers in June 2021. These samples were used to evaluate the Q-POC SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay. The primary analysis was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of the Q-POC test against a reference laboratory-based RT-PCR assay. The overall sensitivity of the Q-POC test compared with the reference test was 96.88% (83.78– 99.92% CI) for a cycle threshold (Ct) cut-off value for the reference test of 35 and 80.00% (64.35–90.95% CI) without altering the reference test’s Ct cut-off value of 40. The Q-POC test is a sensitive, specific and rapid PoC test for SARS-CoV-2 at a reference Ct cut-off value of 35. The Q-POC test provides an accurate option for RT-PCR at PoC without the need for sample pre-processing and laboratory handling, enabling rapid diagnosis and clinical triage in acute care and other settings.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
© The Author(s) 2023. Open Access: This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or
format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the
Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this
article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the
material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from
the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: |
Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII) |
Journal or Publication Title: |
Scientific Reports |
ISSN: |
2045-2322 |
Language: |
en |
Dates: |
Date | Event |
---|
17 June 2023 | Published Online | 18 May 2023 | Accepted |
|
Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 |
Projects: |
|
URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115457 |
Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-35479-9 |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 19 Jun 2023.
Actions (login required)
|
Edit Item |