SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Performance and outcomes of transvenous rotational lead extraction: Results from a prospective, monitored, international clinical study.

Sharma, S; Lee, BK; Garg, A; Peyton, R; Schuler, BT; Mason, P; Delnoy, PP; Gallagher, MM; Hariharan, R; Schaerf, R; et al. Sharma, S; Lee, BK; Garg, A; Peyton, R; Schuler, BT; Mason, P; Delnoy, PP; Gallagher, MM; Hariharan, R; Schaerf, R; Du, R; Serratore, ND; Starck, CT (2021) Performance and outcomes of transvenous rotational lead extraction: Results from a prospective, monitored, international clinical study. Heart Rhythm O2, 2 (2). pp. 113-121. ISSN 2666-5018 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.02.005
SGUL Authors: Gallagher, Mark Michael

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (612kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) plays a critical role in managing patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Mechanical TLE tools, including rotational sheaths, are used to overcome fibrosis and calcification surrounding leads. Prospective clinical data are limited regarding the safety and effectiveness of use of mechanical TLE devices, especially rotational tools. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively investigate the safety and effectiveness of mechanical TLE in real-world usage. METHODS: Patients were enrolled at 10 sites in the United States and Europe to evaluate the use of mechanical TLE devices. Clinical success, complete procedural success, and complications were evaluated through follow-up (median, 29 days). Patient data were source verified and complications were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee (CEC). RESULTS: Between October 2018 and January 2020, mechanical TLE tools, including rotational sheaths, were used to extract 460 leads with a median indwell time of 7.4 years from 230 patients (mean age 64.3 ± 14.4 years). Noninfectious indications for TLE were more common than infectious indications (61.5% vs 38.5%, respectively). The extracted leads included 305 pacemaker leads (66.3%) and 155 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads (33.7%), including 85 leads with passive fixation (18.5%). A bidirectional rotational sheath was needed for 368 leads (88.0%). Clinical success was obtained in 98.7% of procedures; complete procedural success was achieved for 96.3% of leads. CEC-adjudicated device-related major complications occurred in 6 of 230 (2.6%) procedures. No isolated superior vena cava injury or procedural death occurred. CONCLUSION: This prospective clinical study demonstrates that use of mechanical TLE tools, especially bidirectional rotational sheaths, are effective and safe.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: Clinical success, Complication, Mechanical transvenous lead extraction, Prospective clinical trial, Rotational extraction sheath, Complication, Clinical success, Mechanical transvenous, lead extraction, Prospective clinical trial, Rotational extraction sheath
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Heart Rhythm O2
ISSN: 2666-5018
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
April 2021Published
2 March 2021Published Online
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
PubMed ID: 34113913
Web of Science ID: WOS:000905674600001
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115432
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.02.005

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item