Sharma, S;
Lee, BK;
Garg, A;
Peyton, R;
Schuler, BT;
Mason, P;
Delnoy, PP;
Gallagher, MM;
Hariharan, R;
Schaerf, R;
et al.
Sharma, S; Lee, BK; Garg, A; Peyton, R; Schuler, BT; Mason, P; Delnoy, PP; Gallagher, MM; Hariharan, R; Schaerf, R; Du, R; Serratore, ND; Starck, CT
(2021)
Performance and outcomes of transvenous rotational lead extraction: Results from a prospective, monitored, international clinical study.
Heart Rhythm O2, 2 (2).
pp. 113-121.
ISSN 2666-5018
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.02.005
SGUL Authors: Gallagher, Mark Michael
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) plays a critical role in managing patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Mechanical TLE tools, including rotational sheaths, are used to overcome fibrosis and calcification surrounding leads. Prospective clinical data are limited regarding the safety and effectiveness of use of mechanical TLE devices, especially rotational tools. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively investigate the safety and effectiveness of mechanical TLE in real-world usage. METHODS: Patients were enrolled at 10 sites in the United States and Europe to evaluate the use of mechanical TLE devices. Clinical success, complete procedural success, and complications were evaluated through follow-up (median, 29 days). Patient data were source verified and complications were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee (CEC). RESULTS: Between October 2018 and January 2020, mechanical TLE tools, including rotational sheaths, were used to extract 460 leads with a median indwell time of 7.4 years from 230 patients (mean age 64.3 ± 14.4 years). Noninfectious indications for TLE were more common than infectious indications (61.5% vs 38.5%, respectively). The extracted leads included 305 pacemaker leads (66.3%) and 155 implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads (33.7%), including 85 leads with passive fixation (18.5%). A bidirectional rotational sheath was needed for 368 leads (88.0%). Clinical success was obtained in 98.7% of procedures; complete procedural success was achieved for 96.3% of leads. CEC-adjudicated device-related major complications occurred in 6 of 230 (2.6%) procedures. No isolated superior vena cava injury or procedural death occurred. CONCLUSION: This prospective clinical study demonstrates that use of mechanical TLE tools, especially bidirectional rotational sheaths, are effective and safe.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
© 2021 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
Keywords: |
Clinical success, Complication, Mechanical transvenous lead extraction, Prospective clinical trial, Rotational extraction sheath, Complication, Clinical success, Mechanical transvenous, lead extraction, Prospective clinical trial, Rotational extraction sheath |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: |
Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS) |
Journal or Publication Title: |
Heart Rhythm O2 |
ISSN: |
2666-5018 |
Language: |
eng |
Dates: |
Date | Event |
---|
April 2021 | Published | 2 March 2021 | Published Online |
|
Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 |
PubMed ID: |
34113913 |
Web of Science ID: |
WOS:000905674600001 |
|
Go to PubMed abstract |
URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115432 |
Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hroo.2021.02.005 |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 01 Jun 2023.
Actions (login required)
|
Edit Item |