Jones, F; McKevitt, C; Riazi, A; Liston, M
(2017)
How is rehabilitation with and without an integrated self-management approach perceived by UK community-dwelling stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation to explore implementation and contextual variations.
BMJ Open, 7 (4).
e014109.
ISSN 2044-6055
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014109
SGUL Authors: Jones, Fiona
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Self-management programmes could support long-term needs after stroke and using methods integrated into rehabilitation is one option. To explore theoretical assumptions and possible mechanisms of implementation a process evaluation was delivered alongside a cluster trial which has demonstrated feasibility of an integrated self-management programme (Bridges SMP) in community-dwelling stroke survivors. This paper aims to show the extent to which experiences from stroke survivors receiving rehabilitation in control (usual care) and intervention (integrated self-management) sites reflected the differences in rehabilitation received and whether their understandings aligned with the self-management approach employed. DESIGN: Semistructured qualitative interviews carried out as part of a process evaluation analysed thematically. SETTING: Study was based in South London; all interviews were carried out in participants' home setting. PARTICIPANTS: 22 stroke participants recruited; 12 from integrated self-management sites and 10 from usual care sites. RESULTS: All participants revealed shared appreciation of knowledge and support from therapists but subtle differences emerged between sites in respect to perceptions about responsibility, control and how previous experiences were used. Accounts depicted a variance regarding who had structured and planned their rehabilitation, with greater flexibility about content and involvement perceived by participants from the integrated self-management sites. They also provided accounts and experiences which aligned with principles of the intervention, such as self-discovery and problem-solving. CONCLUSIONS: The findings reflect our theoretical assumptions and possible mechanisms of implementation that rehabilitation with a focus on supporting self-management is reflected in accounts and understandings of stroke survivors. Taken together with our previous research this justifies evaluating the effectiveness of Bridges SMP in a larger sample to further contribute to an understanding of the functioning of the intervention, implementation, contextual factors and mechanisms of impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN42534180; Post-results.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Keywords: |
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH, rehabilitation, self-management, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Attitude to Health, Case-Control Studies, Female, Focus Groups, Humans, Independent Living, London, Male, Middle Aged, Qualitative Research, Self-Management, Stroke, Stroke Rehabilitation, Survivors, United Kingdom, Humans, Focus Groups, Case-Control Studies, Attitude to Health, Qualitative Research, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Middle Aged, Survivors, London, Female, Male, Stroke, Independent Living, United Kingdom, Stroke Rehabilitation, Self-Management, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: |
Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH) |
Journal or Publication Title: |
BMJ Open |
ISSN: |
2044-6055 |
Language: |
eng |
Dates: |
Date | Event |
---|
3 April 2017 | Published | 6 February 2017 | Accepted |
|
Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 |
Projects: |
|
PubMed ID: |
28373253 |
Web of Science ID: |
WOS:000402527200063 |
|
Go to PubMed abstract |
URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115257 |
Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014109 |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 24 Mar 2023.
Actions (login required)
|
Edit Item |