SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

What is the feasibility and patient acceptability of a digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation after stroke? A mixed-methods, single-arm feasibility study of the 'OnTrack' intervention for hospital and home use.

Fusari, G; Gibbs, E; Hoskin, L; Lawrence-Jones, A; Dickens, D; Fernandez Crespo, R; Leis, M; Crow, J; Taylor, E; Jones, F; et al. Fusari, G; Gibbs, E; Hoskin, L; Lawrence-Jones, A; Dickens, D; Fernandez Crespo, R; Leis, M; Crow, J; Taylor, E; Jones, F; Darzi, A (2022) What is the feasibility and patient acceptability of a digital system for arm and hand rehabilitation after stroke? A mixed-methods, single-arm feasibility study of the 'OnTrack' intervention for hospital and home use. BMJ Open, 12 (9). e062042. ISSN 2044-6055 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062042
SGUL Authors: Jones, Fiona

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Arm weakness is common after stroke; repetitive activity is critical for recovery but people struggle with knowing what to do, volume, and monitoring progress. We studied the feasibility and acceptability of OnTrack, a digital intervention supporting arm and hand rehabilitation in acute and home settings. DESIGN: A mixed-method, single-arm study evaluating the feasibility of OnTrack for hospital and home use. An independent process evaluation assessed the intervention's fidelity, dose and reach. Amendments to the protocol were necessary after COVID-19. SETTING: Acute stroke services and home settings in North West London. PARTICIPANTS: 12 adults with a stroke diagnosis <6 months previously (first or recurrent) requiring arm rehabilitation in hospital and/or home. INTERVENTION: 12 weeks using the OnTrack system comprising arm tracking and coaching support for self-management. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Recruitment, retention and completion rates; compliance and adherence to the intervention; reasons for study decline/withdrawal.Intervention fidelity and acceptability, evaluated through an independent process evaluation.Patient measures including activity baseline, healthcare activation, arm function and impairment collected at baseline, week 7 and week 14 of participation to assess suitability for a randomised controlled trial (RCT). RESULTS: 181 individuals screened, 37 met eligibility criteria, 24 recruited (65%); of these, 15 (63%) were recruited before COVID-19, and 9 (37%) during. 12 completed the intervention (50%). Despite COVID-19 disruptions, recruitment, retention and completion were in line with prestudy expectations and acceptable for a definitive trial. Participants felt the study requirements were acceptable and the intervention usable. Fidelity of delivery was acceptable according to predetermined fidelity markers. Outcome measures collected helped determine sample size estimates and primary outcomes for an RCT. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was found to be usable and acceptable by participants; study feasibility objectives were met and demonstrated that a definitive RCT would be viable and acceptable. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03944486.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Keywords: neurology, public health, rehabilitation medicine, stroke, telemedicine, Adult, COVID-19, Feasibility Studies, Hospitals, Humans, Self-Management, Stroke, Stroke Rehabilitation, Humans, Feasibility Studies, Adult, Hospitals, Stroke, Stroke Rehabilitation, Self-Management, COVID-19, 1103 Clinical Sciences, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, 1199 Other Medical and Health Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Population Health Research Institute (INPH)
Journal or Publication Title: BMJ Open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
28 September 2022Published
22 August 2022Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
1215-20013National Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
PubMed ID: 36171046
Web of Science ID: WOS:000863416400020
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/115066
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062042

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item