Powell, AA;
Ireland, G;
Baawuah, F;
Beckmann, J;
Okike, IO;
Ahmad, S;
Garstang, J;
Brent, AJ;
Brent, B;
Aiano, F;
et al.
Powell, AA; Ireland, G; Baawuah, F; Beckmann, J; Okike, IO; Ahmad, S; Garstang, J; Brent, AJ; Brent, B; Aiano, F; Hargreaves, J; Langan, SM; Mangtani, P; Nguipdop-Djomo, P; Sturgess, J; Oswald, W; Halliday, K; Rourke, E; Dawe, F; Amin-Chowdhury, Z; Kall, M; Zambon, M; Poh, J; Ijaz, S; Lackenby, A; Elli, J; Brown, KE; Diamond, SI; Ramsay, ME; Ladhani, SN
(2022)
Secondary attack rates in primary and secondary school bubbles following a confirmed case: Active, prospective national surveillance, November to December 2020, England.
PLoS One, 17 (2).
e0262515.
ISSN 1932-6203
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262515
SGUL Authors: Ladhani, Shamez Nizarali
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Following the full re-opening of schools in England and emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Alpha variant, we investigated the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in students and staff who were contacts of a confirmed case in a school bubble (school groupings with limited interactions), along with their household members. METHODS: Primary and secondary school bubbles were recruited into sKIDsBUBBLE after being sent home to self-isolate following a confirmed case of COVID-19 in the bubble. Bubble participants and their household members were sent home-testing kits comprising nasal swabs for RT-PCR testing and whole genome sequencing, and oral fluid swabs for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. RESULTS: During November-December 2020, 14 bubbles were recruited from 7 schools, including 269 bubble contacts (248 students, 21 staff) and 823 household contacts (524 adults, 299 children). The secondary attack rate was 10.0% (6/60) in primary and 3.9% (4/102) in secondary school students, compared to 6.3% (1/16) and 0% (0/1) among staff, respectively. The incidence rate for household contacts of primary school students was 6.6% (12/183) and 3.7% (1/27) for household contacts of primary school staff. In secondary schools, this was 3.5% (11/317) and 0% (0/1), respectively. Household contacts were more likely to test positive if their bubble contact tested positive although there were new infections among household contacts of uninfected bubble contacts. INTERPRETATION: Compared to other institutional settings, the overall risk of secondary infection in school bubbles and their household contacts was low. Our findings are important for developing evidence-based infection prevention guidelines for educational settings.
Item Type: |
Article
|
Additional Information: |
Copyright: © 2022 Powell et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
Keywords: |
Adolescent, Adult, Antibodies, Viral, COVID-19, Child, Contact Tracing, England, Female, Humans, Incidence, Male, Nasopharynx, Prospective Studies, RNA, Viral, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, SARS-CoV-2, Schools, Students, Nasopharynx, Humans, RNA, Viral, Antibodies, Viral, Contact Tracing, Incidence, Prospective Studies, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Schools, Students, Adolescent, Adult, Child, England, Female, Male, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, General Science & Technology |
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: |
Academic Structure > Infection and Immunity Research Institute (INII) |
Journal or Publication Title: |
PLoS One |
ISSN: |
1932-6203 |
Language: |
eng |
Dates: |
Date | Event |
---|
16 February 2022 | Published | 28 December 2021 | Accepted |
|
Publisher License: |
Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 |
PubMed ID: |
35171942 |
Web of Science ID: |
WOS:000795889700005 |
|
Go to PubMed abstract |
URI: |
https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/114593 |
Publisher's version: |
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262515 |
Statistics
Item downloaded times since 28 Jul 2022.
Actions (login required)
|
Edit Item |