SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Clinical outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion versus direct oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior ischemic stroke: A propensity-score matched study.

Korsholm, K; Valentin, JB; Damgaard, D; Diener, H-C; Camm, AJ; Landmesser, U; Hildick-Smith, D; Johnsen, SP; Nielsen-Kudsk, JE (2022) Clinical outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion versus direct oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior ischemic stroke: A propensity-score matched study. Int J Cardiol, 363. pp. 56-63. ISSN 1874-1754 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.065
SGUL Authors: Camm, Alan John

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary data) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (88kB)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This propensity-score matched study investigated clinical outcomes associated with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) versus direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) in patients with AF and prior ischemic stroke. METHODS: AF patients enrolled in the Amulet Observational Study with a history of ischemic stroke and successful LAAO (n = 299) were compared with a propensity-score matched cohort of incident AF patients with prior ischemic stroke and treated by DOAC (n = 301). The control cohort was identified through the Danish National Patient Registries. Propensity score matching was based on covariates of the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, with a 1:2 ratio and using Greedy 5:1 digit matching with replacement. The analysis included 2-years follow-up, with a primary composite outcome of ischemic stroke, major bleeding (BARC ≥ 3) or all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc scores were 5.26 (1.42) and 5.40 (1.31) and HAS-BLED scores were 3.95 (0.91) and 4.03 (0.96), for the LAAO and DOAC group, respectively. Total number of primary composite outcome events were 61 (12.4 events/100 patient-years) and 117 (26.9 events/100 patient-years) in the LAAO and DOAC group, respectively. Risk of the primary composite outcome was significantly lower in the LAAO group, hazard rate ratio [HR] 0.48 (95% CI: 0.35-0.65). Ischemic stroke risk was comparable, HR 0.71 (95% CI: 0.34-1.45), while risk of major bleeding, HR 0.41 (95% CI: 0.25-0.67), and all-cause mortality, HR 0.48 (95% CI: 0.32-0.71), were significantly lower with LAAO. Cardiovascular mortality did not differ statistically between the LAAO and DOAC group, HR 0.75 (95% CI: 0.39-1.42). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: This study indicated significantly lower risk of the composite outcome of stroke, major bleeding and all-cause mortality with LAAO therapy compared to DOAC, in patients with AF and prior stroke. The stroke prevention effectiveness appeared similar, with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding events with LAAO. The suggested clinical benefit of LAAO over DOAC require confirmation in the ongoing randomized OCCLUSION-AF trial.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: Atrial fibrillation, Direct oral anticoagulation, Left atrial appendage occlusion, Stroke, 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Cardiovascular System & Hematology
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS)
Journal or Publication Title: Int J Cardiol
ISSN: 1874-1754
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
15 September 2022Published
30 June 2022Published Online
27 June 2022Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0
Projects:
Project IDFunderFunder ID
NNF17OC0024868Novo Nordisk Research FoundationUNSPECIFIED
NNF17OC0029510Novo Nordisk Research FoundationUNSPECIFIED
PubMed ID: 35780932
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/114562
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.065

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item