Korsholm, K; Valentin, JB; Damgaard, D; Diener, H-C; Camm, AJ; Landmesser, U; Hildick-Smith, D; Johnsen, SP; Nielsen-Kudsk, JE
(2022)
Clinical outcomes of left atrial appendage occlusion versus direct oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation and prior ischemic stroke: A propensity-score matched study.
Int J Cardiol, 363.
pp. 56-63.
ISSN 1874-1754
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.065
SGUL Authors: Camm, Alan John
|
PDF
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview |
|
Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supplementary data)
Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (88kB) |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This propensity-score matched study investigated clinical outcomes associated with left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) versus direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) in patients with AF and prior ischemic stroke. METHODS: AF patients enrolled in the Amulet Observational Study with a history of ischemic stroke and successful LAAO (n = 299) were compared with a propensity-score matched cohort of incident AF patients with prior ischemic stroke and treated by DOAC (n = 301). The control cohort was identified through the Danish National Patient Registries. Propensity score matching was based on covariates of the CHA2DS2-VASc and HAS-BLED scores, with a 1:2 ratio and using Greedy 5:1 digit matching with replacement. The analysis included 2-years follow-up, with a primary composite outcome of ischemic stroke, major bleeding (BARC ≥ 3) or all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Mean (SD) CHA2DS2-VASc scores were 5.26 (1.42) and 5.40 (1.31) and HAS-BLED scores were 3.95 (0.91) and 4.03 (0.96), for the LAAO and DOAC group, respectively. Total number of primary composite outcome events were 61 (12.4 events/100 patient-years) and 117 (26.9 events/100 patient-years) in the LAAO and DOAC group, respectively. Risk of the primary composite outcome was significantly lower in the LAAO group, hazard rate ratio [HR] 0.48 (95% CI: 0.35-0.65). Ischemic stroke risk was comparable, HR 0.71 (95% CI: 0.34-1.45), while risk of major bleeding, HR 0.41 (95% CI: 0.25-0.67), and all-cause mortality, HR 0.48 (95% CI: 0.32-0.71), were significantly lower with LAAO. Cardiovascular mortality did not differ statistically between the LAAO and DOAC group, HR 0.75 (95% CI: 0.39-1.42). Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: This study indicated significantly lower risk of the composite outcome of stroke, major bleeding and all-cause mortality with LAAO therapy compared to DOAC, in patients with AF and prior stroke. The stroke prevention effectiveness appeared similar, with a significantly lower risk of major bleeding events with LAAO. The suggested clinical benefit of LAAO over DOAC require confirmation in the ongoing randomized OCCLUSION-AF trial.
Item Type: | Article | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Additional Information: | © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). | |||||||||
Keywords: | Atrial fibrillation, Direct oral anticoagulation, Left atrial appendage occlusion, Stroke, 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology, 1117 Public Health and Health Services, Cardiovascular System & Hematology | |||||||||
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: | Academic Structure > Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute (MCS) | |||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Int J Cardiol | |||||||||
ISSN: | 1874-1754 | |||||||||
Language: | eng | |||||||||
Dates: |
|
|||||||||
Publisher License: | Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 | |||||||||
Projects: |
|
|||||||||
PubMed ID: | 35780932 | |||||||||
Go to PubMed abstract | ||||||||||
URI: | https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/114562 | |||||||||
Publisher's version: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.06.065 |
Statistics
Actions (login required)
Edit Item |