SORA

Advancing, promoting and sharing knowledge of health through excellence in teaching, clinical practice and research into the prevention and treatment of illness

Emerging from emergency pandemic pedagogy: A survey of anatomical educators in the United Kingdom and Ireland.

Dulohery, K; Scully, D; Longhurst, GJ; Stone, DM; Campbell, T (2021) Emerging from emergency pandemic pedagogy: A survey of anatomical educators in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Clin Anat, 34 (6). pp. 948-960. ISSN 1098-2353 https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23758
SGUL Authors: Longhurst, Georga Jane

[img]
Preview
PDF Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (2MB) | Preview
[img] Microsoft Word (.docx) (Supporting Information) Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (18kB)

Abstract

It is critical that academic opinion of pandemic pedagogy is comprehensively quantified in order to inform future practices. Thus, this study examines how anatomists in the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland (ROI) perceive the teaching adaptations made in response to COVID-19, and how these adaptations have impacted their experiences teaching, their online work environment and community. Data was collected via a questionnaire from 24 anatomists across 15 universities in the UK (11) and ROI (4). With regards to teaching, 95.6% of academics have upskilled in new technologies to meet the demands of distance teaching. Academics (95.8%) preferred face-to-face delivery of practical sessions. Most universities (80.0%) reported that practical sessions will continue in a new form that ensures social distancing. However, 50.0% of academics are uncertain if these adaptations will improve student learning. Many anatomists believe that the new adaptations may hinder student-student (66.7%) and student-tutor (45.8%) interactions. Regarding assessment, 52.6% of academics preferred traditional methods to online. Remote online assessment was difficult to protect against collusion, but provided time saving opportunities for academics. Finally, in terms of working environment, 83.3% of academics stated that their workload increased; 54.2% preferred working on site rather than remotely and 79.2% think that staff interactions are better when working on site. These results demonstrate a widespread concern amongst anatomists regarding the pandemic-induced adaptations to teaching, assessment and working environment. However, important opportunities were also identified that could ultimately serve to benefit students and educators alike.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: © 2021 The Authors. Clinical Anatomy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Clinical Anatomists. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Keywords: COVID-19, assessment, distance teaching, gross anatomy, medical education, remote working, Anatomy & Morphology, 1116 Medical Physiology, 1103 Clinical Sciences
SGUL Research Institute / Research Centre: Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE)
Academic Structure > Institute of Medical & Biomedical Education (IMBE) > Centre for Biomedical Education (INMEBE)
Journal or Publication Title: Clin Anat
ISSN: 1098-2353
Language: eng
Dates:
DateEvent
5 August 2021Published
26 May 2021Published Online
14 May 2021Accepted
Publisher License: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0
PubMed ID: 33998056
Go to PubMed abstract
URI: https://openaccess.sgul.ac.uk/id/eprint/113297
Publisher's version: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23758

Actions (login required)

Edit Item Edit Item